Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem |
| Date | 2024-10-03 13:21 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <lm6gtuFeqmlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <lm3l4lF1ba6U1@mid.individual.net> <lm45leF3lqlU1@mid.individual.net> <lm4bh3F4ihnU1@mid.individual.net> <vdkc0c$3cm51$1@dont-email.me> <jderfj1373o1mvk3fp0d6oank0np1iufs6@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Petzl wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 06:55:37 +1000, alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> Keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 2/10/2024 11:14 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 30/09/2024 10:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 30-Sept-24 6:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 30-Sept-24 3:50 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 28-Sept-24 5:48 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> It's the manufacturers software. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/09/flaw-in-kia-web-portal-let- >>>>>>>>>>>> researchers-track-hack-cars/ >>>>>>>>>>> The same potential issue applies to any "internet of things" >>>>>>>>>>> device in your home. If they are on your internal LAN (by >>>>>>>>>>> accessing your WiFi, for example), then they're providing a >>>>>>>>>>> tunnel from the supplier's computer system through your >>>>>>>>>>> firewall, and you have no idea how well the supplier's end is >>>>>>>>>>> protected. >>>>>>>>>> I won't have any internet 'listening' devices in any home I live in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, but it's not just those. Anything that can be remotely >>>>>>>>> updated automatically (sometimes whether you want it to be, or >>>>>>>>> not), or which can be talked to via a smartphone, will usually >>>>>>>>> work by phoning home, >>>>>>> cameras for instance. I have all internal cameras set facing wall >>>>>>> surfaces, so even if they were hacked nothing would be seen. but I >>>>>>> would know if they were hacked because they would have turned to >>>>>>> face into the rooms. I turn them via smartphone control to monitor >>>>>>> the rooms if away for any length of time, like holidays. but if >>>>>>> they were hacked I'm not sure what info could be got from them. >>>>>> Have you ever considered that you might be paranoid? >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway anybody hacking into your "Security" cameras (notoriously >>>>>> easy to hack) would likely be more interested in incorporating them >>>>>> into a botnet rather than observing whatever disgusting things that >>>>>> you get up to in your house. >>>>> perhaps your mum never told you.. "if you don't have anything >>>>> worthwhile to say, don't say anything". or if she did, you didn't listen >>>>> >>>> Perhaps you should have thought of that before cross-posting a stupid >>>> Elon Musk rant across the Usenet. >>> he's a hell of a lot smarter and successful than you,... >> Eh? Could you be a bit more specific? >> >> >> alvey >> > You don't get much do you? > Elon Musk achievements here is just a small one of a graet many > https://youtu.be/Aq7rDQx9jns?si=79Q3otVV7R2ga6UY] > SpaceX Nails Landing of Reusable Rocket on Land the richest man in the world, and likely to be the world's first trillionaire https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/17/business/elon-musk-richest-person-trillionaire/index.html > __ > Petzl > Anthony Albanese at age of 18 got a job for nine months in > commonwealth bank > <https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vern-hughes-92341119_it-is-not-true-that-anthony-albanese-has-activity-7068765502021517312-jwAC> > https://t.ly/5jJjE > It is not true that Anthony Albanese has never held a real job. He > worked in the Commonwealth Bank for 9 months when he was 18. > > Albo's replacement at Commonwealth Bank > https://youtu.be/hWemeervqhA?si=-M7SWX55dyWD_ked > just push"F5" to remove advert -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
Back to aus.cars | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-09-28 19:48 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-09-28 20:36 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-09-28 21:27 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-09-30 12:48 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-09-30 17:50 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-09-30 18:48 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-09-30 18:49 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-09-30 22:58 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-02 08:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-02 10:30 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 12:27 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 13:56 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 06:51 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 13:33 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 15:00 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-03 17:46 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 18:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-03 19:48 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-03 20:08 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-03 22:52 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-10-04 08:57 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-04 10:31 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 10:51 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 10:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-04 11:07 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 14:19 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-10-05 16:49 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-05 19:33 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-06 00:02 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-06 06:43 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-10-05 16:43 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-03 22:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 00:13 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 00:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-04 09:03 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-10-04 11:11 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Camela Toe <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-04 11:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 14:17 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-10-05 14:07 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-05 19:49 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-05 21:12 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-04 10:03 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 11:14 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-02 15:57 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 17:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 06:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 07:28 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 13:21 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-03 12:08 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 13:42 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-03 14:48 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 16:56 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-10-03 13:06 +0800
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-03 17:44 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@cheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 21:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-04 16:47 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-10-04 17:07 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 19:26 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 19:42 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 20:00 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 19:15 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-04 20:03 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-04 22:33 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-05 19:46 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-05 21:11 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-05 22:40 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem jonz <not-here@over-there.org> - 2024-10-06 16:10 +1100
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-04 19:23 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-05 07:19 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-10-05 08:14 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-05 10:51 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-05 10:43 +1000
csiph-web