Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2221

More information yet...

From	aminer <aminer@toto.net>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads, comp.programming
Subject	More information yet...
Date	2014-04-22 19:42 -0700
Organization	albasani.net
Message-ID	<lj6uoi$ecb$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

Question:

Why Amine must we use this fast concurrent FIFO queue
and not simply use a two lock concurrent FIFO queue,
that means a lock around the push() and a lock around the pop() ?


Answer:

With the two lock method, that means a lock around the push() and a lock 
around the pop(), you will get less parallelism , but this fast FIFO 
queue that i am presenting to you have more parallelism and it is very fast.


You can download this fast concurrent FIFO queue version 1.0 from:

http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More information yet... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-22 19:42 -0700

csiph-web