Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2220
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: More information... |
| Date | 2014-04-22 19:31 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <lj6u3o$ddd$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lj6tqs$crc$1@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 4/22/2014 7:26 PM, aminer wrote: > You have to know that a TicketSpinlock with a proportional backoff > has a problem , if you use 4 threads on 4 cores the Ticketspinlock > will do very well its job, but if you use more threads than the > number of cores the TicketSpinlock will not scale, This problem do happen also with an array based lock or queue based lock such as MCS and CLH. So the simple Spinlock with a backoff scales well and avoids this problem and that's very important to know. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More information... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-22 19:26 -0700 Re: More information... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-22 19:31 -0700
csiph-web