Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2221 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-04-22 19:42 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-04-22 19:42 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
More information yet... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-22 19:42 -0700
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-22 19:42 -0700 |
| Subject | More information yet... |
| Message-ID | <lj6uoi$ecb$1@news.albasani.net> |
Hello, Question: Why Amine must we use this fast concurrent FIFO queue and not simply use a two lock concurrent FIFO queue, that means a lock around the push() and a lock around the pop() ? Answer: With the two lock method, that means a lock around the push() and a lock around the pop(), you will get less parallelism , but this fast FIFO queue that i am presenting to you have more parallelism and it is very fast. You can download this fast concurrent FIFO queue version 1.0 from: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web