Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27655
| From | David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java code |
| Date | 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lf03so$jpe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ac8eddc9-1375-4387-9fe4-89a8a11ef11f@googlegroups.com> <1o6dnRRLlOIZI5TOnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com> <lerdtn$un3$1@dont-email.me> <2tidncX0ksO_PIzOnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com> |
On 01/03/2014 3:58 AM, lipska the kat wrote: >> Even if you dislike the smartass answers, you shouldn't be answering >> people's homework questions for them. > > Why? For one thing, he or she probably attends an institution with an Academic Integrity code that forbids them asking people to solve their homework problems, so you're likely helping someone who is being deliberately dishonest from the beginning. I suspect he or she has access to instructors, teaching assistants, and tutors who can spend one-on-one time leading him or her to the right insights into solving the problem without actually giving away the whole answer. Someone *might* be able to do such a thing online, and IIRC someone upthread tried to do so, but face-to-face is usually faster and more effective because it's easier to clue in to what's confusing the student. As to your comment upthread that people can gain insight from seeing a solution, that may well happen *occasionally* but in my experience that's much rarer than a student simply copying the answer and being totally unable to cope with similar questions in the future, which is the opposite of your intent.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java code "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-21 14:29 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 01:10 -0600
Re: java code Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-22 12:36 +0100
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 13:57 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 12:05 -0600
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 20:02 +0100
Re: java code Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-23 00:52 -0800
Re: java code Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-21 08:55 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-23 09:25 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 20:47 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-24 09:06 +0000
Re: java code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-02-24 19:23 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-25 09:22 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 15:08 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 08:47 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-25 03:56 -0600
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-25 14:54 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 09:07 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:40 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 14:54 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 16:10 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 15:45 +0000
Re: java code Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +0100
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:48 +0100
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-27 09:49 -0600
Re: java code Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-02-27 19:24 +0100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:53 -0800
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 16:10 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:36 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 20:51 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:31 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:44 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:49 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:58 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:00 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:36 +1100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:59 -0800
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-02-28 20:42 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:58 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:00 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:45 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 22:04 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:13 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:05 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 08:57 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 22:02 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 11:57 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-03-02 06:57 -0600
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500
Re: java code rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-02-26 22:06 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +1100
Re: java code v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000
csiph-web