Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27586

Re: java code

Date 2014-02-25 09:22 +0000
From lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com>
Organization Trollbusters 3
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: java code
References <ac8eddc9-1375-4387-9fe4-89a8a11ef11f@googlegroups.com> <1o6dnRRLlOIZI5TOnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com> <79f3dad1-4e94-434c-83f1-6c0eeff87ec3@googlegroups.com> <I9udneg4xs0YlpbOnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com> <530be291$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Message-ID <w6Kdnax3lfJL_ZHOnZ2dnUVZ7r6dnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/02/14 00:23, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 2/24/2014 4:06 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 24/02/14 04:47, Lew wrote:
>>> lipska the kat wrote:
>>>>      public static void main(String[] args) {
>>>>         int increment = 11;
>>>
>>> This would be better as a constant.
>>
>> Well firstly, you buffoon, although const *is* a reserved word in Java
>> it is not currently used, do you mean final? We have been down this road
>> soooooo many time before in here haven't we?
>
> He did not say const - he said constant.
>
> Which per JLS and normal Java terminology means static final.

The variable concerned has block scope within main.
You cannot apply the static modifier here.

static final int increment = 11;

my compiler says no with

Illegal modifier for parameter increment only final is permitted	

So, you *could say*

final int increment

however this is not a constant because it's (potential) value is not 
known at the time of declaration, at this point it is a 'variable'

later you can say (for example)

increment = Integer.parseInt(args[1]);

Now it's a final int but not a constant according to you via apparently 
the JLS and 'normal Java terminology'

You could increase the visibility of increment to class scope, then you 
*can* say

static final int increment = 11;

but you can also say

static final int increment;

increment is not a constant, it's an uninitialized static final int, 
there's a difference.

You can then say

increment = 11;

However this would make the scope of increment wider which is another 
Bloch no no.

Obviously I can't prove the following in Java as the reserved word const 
is unused so I'll use C

in C (gcc -std=c99)

const int x;

x is a constant

If you don't initialize at declaration time it has value 0 and cannot be 
changed, it is in effect read only. If you try and do this later

x = 10;  compiler says no.

Of course you can do this

const int x = 10;

but only at the time of declaration.

So then Arne, how exactly would you make the variable increment constant 
within main using your own criteria of a 'constant' in Java being static 
final.

As always I'll be delighted to be shown how wrong I am.








-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer,
treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

java code "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:03 -0800
  Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-21 14:29 +0100
    Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 01:10 -0600
      Re: java code Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-22 12:36 +0100
      Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 13:57 +0100
        Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 12:05 -0600
          Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 20:02 +0100
    Re: java code Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-23 00:52 -0800
  Re: java code Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-21 08:55 -0800
  Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-23 09:25 +0000
    Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 20:47 -0800
      Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-24 09:06 +0000
        Re: java code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-02-24 19:23 -0500
          Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-25 09:22 +0000
            Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 15:08 -0800
              Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 08:47 +0000
        Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-25 03:56 -0600
    Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-25 14:54 -0800
      Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 09:07 +0000
        Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:40 +0100
      Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 14:54 +0000
        Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 16:10 +0100
          Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 15:45 +0000
            Re: java code Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +0100
            Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:48 +0100
              Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-27 09:49 -0600
              Re: java code Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-02-27 19:24 +0100
          Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:53 -0800
          Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 16:10 -0800
            Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:36 +0000
              Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 20:51 +1100
                Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:31 +0000
                Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:44 +1100
                Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:49 +0000
                Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:58 +1100
                Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:00 +0000
                Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:36 +1100
        Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:59 -0800
    Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-02-28 20:42 -0500
      Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:58 +0000
        Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:00 +1100
          Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:45 +0000
            Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 22:04 +1100
              Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:13 +0000
                Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:05 +1100
                Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 08:57 +0000
                Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 22:02 +1100
                Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 11:57 +0000
                Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-03-02 06:57 -0600
        Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500
  Re: java code rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-02-26 22:06 +0000
    Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +1100
  Re: java code v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000

csiph-web