Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #12157

Re: well it works!

Show all headers | View raw

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> Not if trying to tie knots is his hobby.  Lots of people have silly
> hobbies at which they will never be much good.  What's bothered me (and
> I want to stress that I am only a little bothered -- there's no great
> crime here) is the vitriol that is directed at him by almost everyone. I
> can't see the point of it.

If you only know him from web authoring groups, I can understand your 
point of view. However, RtS has been posting to Usenet for, what, nearly 
two decades, and it is a rare case if you find a reply from him that is 
not rude in some way or another.

He frequents/ed trucking groups for quite awhile; kook groups; general 
interest groups; and more. He has claimed to collect child pornography; he 
disses cops all the time; he's clueless about copyright law; he gloated 
when his hardworking parents died and left him a seven-figure inheritance 
(info he published on his own web site in 2008); and he even won his very 
own award back in the last century.

Spend a few moments here, if you wish:
http://home.comcast.net/~unit24/cenkoc/index1.html

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
    Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
      Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
        Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
          Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
            Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
              Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
              Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
            Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
      Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
        Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
          Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
        Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
          Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
  Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
    Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
    Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
  no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

csiph-web