Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #615824
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru |
| Date | 2023-07-21 06:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <khuh2tFkg96U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <khrvrcF8365U1@mid.individual.net> <u9ar0n$3ae65$1@paganini.bofh.team> <u9ar5h$2kis4$1@dont-email.me> <u9bhg5$2odtu$1@dont-email.me> <u9c4c9$2rpbs$7@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am 20.07.2023 um 22:10 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > On 7/20/2023 7:48 AM, Volney wrote: >> On 7/20/2023 4:27 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 7/20/2023 1:24 AM, π©π©π©π©π©π© wrote: >> [] >> >>> What would happen if Russia launched, say, 42 hyper sonic state of >>> the art anti ship missiles at a single US carrier? >>> >> No more εRuβ‘οΈβ‘οΈiaε, 30 minutes later. >> >> Even εPutlerε isn't crazy enough to try that. The problem for the US fleet: the Russians have their naval base upon the Crimean peninsula, from where they can efficiantly control the Black Sea. This fact is actually the real cause of the current war, because the US cannot attack Russia without ships. And as long as the Russians can sink any vessel entering the Black Sea, the US Navy cannot approach Russian borders. Anyhow, I could imagine, that the Russians are somehow able and also willing to sink any carrier or other warship entering the Black Sea, hence that will most likely not happen. So, there is kind of stalemate in the conflict and no side is able to gain significant ground, while the Russians are apparently happy with what they got and the Nato unhappy with what the Russians have. The Russians have also another unfortunate option: they could use their fleet to attack the Ukraine from sea with their battleships. As the Ukraine has no such ships, this would be a very asymmetric attack. And the Nato cannot efficiently help, because they cannot bring their ships into the Black Sea. So, in effect the Crimean peninsula is the key to the conflict and that's why the Russians will defend that position by everything they have at their disposal. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:49 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-11 12:26 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 03:39 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-12 07:57 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 23:12 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Miguel Sfakianos <iasi@ikmikksk.gn> - 2023-07-12 10:15 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 03:46 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Mickeal Tselios <stii@imklkkol.eo> - 2023-07-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-13 09:33 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Kodi Blades <aeeo@biikksek.is> - 2023-07-13 14:21 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-12 21:57 +1000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 05:03 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-12 23:24 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 22:29 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-13 09:40 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 07:52 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Curtiss Strilakos <scss@urriourr.os> - 2023-07-13 17:42 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-14 07:13 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 22:16 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 15:07 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 12:28 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 18:46 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-15 06:46 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 22:14 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-16 07:01 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 22:04 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-16 08:30 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 00:57 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-17 07:01 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 23:58 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-18 08:04 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 23:41 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-19 07:42 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 22:52 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-20 07:43 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-19 23:13 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru π©π©π©π©π©π© <urma@isuarmsa.rr> - 2023-07-20 08:24 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 01:27 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Layne Jatzkovsky <sont@vaastvol.ea> - 2023-07-20 09:03 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-20 10:48 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 13:10 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-21 06:50 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 14:26 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-24 08:22 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 23:37 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-25 07:21 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 22:48 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-26 09:17 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 00:49 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-28 07:30 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Paul Awtandiloff <wnft@ifawllfo.lo> - 2023-07-20 20:44 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 17:15 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Bruce Zhigunov <iguu@uuznzczu.ui> - 2023-07-21 13:27 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-22 14:36 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Jona Babakov <ooba@jntaajta.aa> - 2023-07-22 20:25 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Augusta Prigorodov <rotu@popugtuo.io> - 2023-07-23 00:56 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-23 08:35 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 00:03 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Kip Mochanovsky <kcva@pckohooy.kk> - 2023-07-23 12:31 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 01:33 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Webster Mulatov <oeas@wltmrwrm.va> - 2023-07-20 09:49 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 13:40 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 16:01 -0700
csiph-web