Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616183
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru |
| Date | 2023-07-28 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kih217Fllr7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <0f01f812-24a2-47a4-ae91-b57f5a22a03bn@googlegroups.com> <ki94dmFbab9U1@mid.individual.net> <2b223c5b-aaef-4d9f-bee3-f59fb56d4b72n@googlegroups.com> <kibvj8Fpa6sU1@mid.individual.net> <bd0785bd-a08f-499d-b209-d4843b78b316n@googlegroups.com> |
Am 26.07.2023 um 09:49 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 09:17:02 UTC+2, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 25.07.2023 um 07:48 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: >>> On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 07:20:59 UTC+2, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> Am 24.07.2023 um 08:37 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: >>>>> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 08:21:50 UTC+2, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It is actually much easier and safer to attack from land than from a ship. >>>>> >>>>> Right, so - if US wanted to engage on Black Sea - they would >>>>> negotiate and use the land airfields of their allies. >>>>> >>>> Sure. >>>> >>>> But in this case the closest alies would be Poland, Romania and the >>>> Baltic Republics. >>> >>> I'm sure Ukrainians would gladly make their bases availiable. >>> Not sure how about Turkey. >>> >> Sure, but the Nato would not use these bases, because the Nato is sofar >> not a party in this war. >> >> If the Nato would send their own tropps into the Ukraine, the Nato would >> become a participant in the conflict and that conflict a war between >> Nato and Russia. > > Well, aren't we considering a hypothetical war of Nato > against Russia? So - what are we considering? > I was actually discussing the war, which is apparently happening now in the Ukraine. The hypothetical part was used as means to estimate the actions of the participants in the future. But, on the other hand, the topic is actually VERY off-topic here, hence we could stop this discussion now. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:49 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-11 12:26 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 03:39 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-12 07:57 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 23:12 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Miguel Sfakianos <iasi@ikmikksk.gn> - 2023-07-12 10:15 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 03:46 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Mickeal Tselios <stii@imklkkol.eo> - 2023-07-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-13 09:33 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Kodi Blades <aeeo@biikksek.is> - 2023-07-13 14:21 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-12 21:57 +1000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 05:03 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-12 23:24 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 22:29 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-13 09:40 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 07:52 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Curtiss Strilakos <scss@urriourr.os> - 2023-07-13 17:42 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-14 07:13 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 22:16 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 15:07 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 12:28 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 18:46 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-15 06:46 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 22:14 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-16 07:01 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 22:04 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-16 08:30 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 00:57 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-17 07:01 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 23:58 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-18 08:04 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 23:41 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-19 07:42 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 22:52 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-20 07:43 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-19 23:13 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru 💩💩💩💩💩💩 <urma@isuarmsa.rr> - 2023-07-20 08:24 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 01:27 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Layne Jatzkovsky <sont@vaastvol.ea> - 2023-07-20 09:03 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-20 10:48 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 13:10 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-21 06:50 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 14:26 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-24 08:22 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 23:37 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-25 07:21 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 22:48 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-26 09:17 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 00:49 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-28 07:30 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Paul Awtandiloff <wnft@ifawllfo.lo> - 2023-07-20 20:44 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 17:15 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Bruce Zhigunov <iguu@uuznzczu.ui> - 2023-07-21 13:27 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-22 14:36 -0400
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Jona Babakov <ooba@jntaajta.aa> - 2023-07-22 20:25 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Augusta Prigorodov <rotu@popugtuo.io> - 2023-07-23 00:56 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-23 08:35 +0200
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 00:03 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Kip Mochanovsky <kcva@pckohooy.kk> - 2023-07-23 12:31 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 01:33 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Webster Mulatov <oeas@wltmrwrm.va> - 2023-07-20 09:49 +0000
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 13:40 -0700
Re: Inconsistent prediction of yhe physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 16:01 -0700
csiph-web