Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.science |
| Subject | Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire |
| Date | 2023-03-09 14:07 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <k6t0raFas8pU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tuatmu$137m1$1@dont-email.me> <k6sc64F7r3qU2@mid.individual.net> <tub2ft$1400p$2@dont-email.me> <k6shkqF7r3qU7@mid.individual.net> <tubb5o$15fm8$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 9/03/2023 12:01 pm, Noddy wrote: > On 9/03/2023 9:47 am, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/03/2023 9:33 am, Noddy wrote: > >>>> OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough >>>> oil for our needs. >>> >>> No, we don't, but we are capable of producing roughly one third of >>> our current daily needs from our own domestic supplies. That means >>> that fuel would become limited, and certainly much more expensive, >>> but we wouldn't be left without it. >>> >>> This country got through WWII with fuel rationing, and if we had to >>> do something like that again we could. >>> >>> >> >> **I knew someone would bring up WWII. Australia's population was MUCH >> smaller and MUCH, MUCH, MUCH less reliant on fossil fuels back then. >> We were desperate enough to make oil from shale deposits (very, VERY >> expensively). The comparisons with how things were 80 years ago and >> completely irrelevant. > > Not in the slightest. > > It's relative. We were using far less fuel back then, but we were also > producing far less as well. We've had rationing before, and if we had to > resort to those days again we would. look at the Covid restricted world > we've just emerged from for example. 5 years ago had you told anyone > that we would have a world wide pandemic that would see us all be locked > down like rats in our own homes people would have thought you were a > complete nutbag and moved to have you committed. Yet there we all were > doing exactly what we needed to do in order to get by. > > It's not something that we've never done before, or are incapable of > ever doing again. > > It's that simple.... > >> Make no mistake: ALL available oil will be dedicated to essential >> services and the military. > > The only "mistake" being made here is your overly simplistic view on how > you perceive things would play out in such as scenario in my opinion. > > In the first instance, the ability of the Chinese to completely surround > and cut off this country from the outside world are absolutely zero. We > have one of the biggest unbroken coastlines in the world, and as > powerful as the Chinese military may be putting an impenetrable "wall" > all the way around this country is entirely beyond their ability. This > isn't Taiwan we're talking about here. **How many places can an oil tanker disgorge it's cargo in Australia? Do you honestly imagine that China cannot track oil tankers bound for Australia? If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the tanker operator will not comply? I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track. China can very easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely will, unless there is a change of leadership in China. > > Secondly, our ability to produce our own fuels, both fossil and > synthetic, has never been adequately tested. We've relied heavily on > imports purely for economic reasons, but that doesn't mean we're not > capable of producing our own fuels should the need arise. I doubt that > we'd be able to meet our current requirements, but I also doubt we'd be > unable to produce enough to get by with restrictions. > **AFAIK, we have two oil refineries left. > In other words, I don't believe your "end of the world as we know it" > predictions are anywhere near as accurate as you like to think they are. **We'll see. When the Republicans take office in the US, we'll be fucked. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
Back to aus.cars | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2023-03-08 03:02 +0100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-08 13:40 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-08 15:22 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2023-03-08 16:00 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-03-08 17:47 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 07:50 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 08:11 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 08:14 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2023-03-09 07:21 +1000
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 08:41 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 09:37 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 09:43 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 12:17 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 14:20 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 15:48 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-03-09 23:30 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire "jonz@ nothere.com" <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 20:18 -0800
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 10:56 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 11:18 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 12:40 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 13:30 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 15:02 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 17:01 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire "jonz@ nothere.com" <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 20:06 -0800
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 09:34 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 09:33 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 09:47 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 12:01 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 14:07 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 15:59 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2023-03-09 16:27 +1000
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 20:19 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 22:59 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-10 12:42 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-10 13:53 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-10 14:32 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 10:48 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire alvey <Patty.O.Furniture@Coast.org> - 2023-03-08 23:58 +0000
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-03-09 12:46 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-08 16:08 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire "jonz@ nothere.com" <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 22:11 -0800
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-08 20:12 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2023-03-08 19:40 +1000
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 09:02 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 11:08 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 11:23 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-03-09 12:15 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2023-03-09 13:58 +1100
Re: a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire Noddy <me@home.com> - 2023-03-09 12:18 +1100
csiph-web