Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.usage.english > #1146192

Re: 'shake well'

From Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net>
Newsgroups alt.usage.english
Subject Re: 'shake well'
Date 2026-07-04 08:46 -0400
Message-ID <jpvh4ltdrip39hbvi4d0il7b2bsb38tqch@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <36rg4lhpgd2dmaq9uk5j6m8rgon3nkjiu8@4ax.com> <vdvg4l9h23i6uu9h2li0moeqbqi670q99i@4ax.com> <nas412FiqtU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 4 Jul 2026 12:02:10 +0200, occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

>On 04/07/2026 06:03, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> OK...I've covered your bitch...now for mine:  Many products -
>> mustards, for example - now come only in squeezable bottles.  "The
>> Hulk" couldn't squeeze more than 80% of the contents of any of them,
>> and it gets increasingly difficult to get the first 50% out.
>> 
>> I solve that by cutting open the squeezable bottle when I first bring
>> it home and using a small spatula to transfer all of the contents into
>> short and wide screw-top plastic containers.  Then I can use a table
>> knife to apply the product.  Or, a measuring spoon when adding to a
>> recipe.  
>
>Cutting open plastic bottles sounds messy, especially if there is 20%
>gooey fluid in there already.
>
>Have you tried storing them upside down before use? Let gravity do the
>work. I have seen some smart bottle designs where the natural resting
>position of the bottle is upside down i.e. the nozzle is pointing
>downwards. You uncap the nozzle and squeeze. The ketchup or mayonnaise
>is already at the exit point, and it splutters out.

My Prell shampoo has a large, flat top, so I store it upside down 
without any problem. 

My body lotion has a spout at the top, with a straw (?) running 
to the bottom -- which stops working when contents are low. 
Then, I take off the top to access the lotion. Once it is that low,
I squeeze it between other bottles, etc.,  in an upside-down position
(after shaking becomes too slow to move the lotion). 

-- 
Rich Ulrich

Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-03 22:33 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 00:03 -0400
    Re: 'shake well' Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 23:05 -0700
    Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 12:02 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:46 -0400
        Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 20:26 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 09:28 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 06:38 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 08:49 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 06:51 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:48 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 08:28 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 08:43 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 08:02 +0100
      Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-04 11:53 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-04 20:05 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-07-04 22:59 +1200
      Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 16:25 +0200
        Re: 'shake well' HVS <office@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> - 2026-07-04 16:11 +0100
          Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 16:27 +0100
          Re: 'shake well' richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-04 15:40 +0000
            Re: 'shake well' Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-05 10:06 +0100
        Re: 'shake well' Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-07-04 16:00 +0000
        Re: 'shake well' Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-07-05 18:05 +1200
          Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-05 08:45 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:39 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-04 11:53 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 12:05 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-04 12:29 +0100
        Re: 'shake well' Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 00:20 -0700
        Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-05 09:22 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 21:49 +0800
  Re: 'shake well' Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-04 20:01 +0100

csiph-web