Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality |
| Date | 2012-01-24 13:16 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jfmavn$tm6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <8739b6zajt.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <20120123115909.372@kylheku.com> <jfkgo9$dl2$1@dont-email.me> <4F1DCB5E.7080102@verizon.net> <fa2e7dcd-9285-4269-8c0a-656302c28c70@dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
On 24/01/12 11:31, gwowen wrote: > On Jan 23, 9:04 pm, James Kuyper<jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote: >> On 01/23/2012 03:42 PM, ec429 wrote: >> >>> On 23/01/12 20:06, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >>>> In English math terminology >>> <snip gibberish about equations> >>> Ok, maybe we should call them the "order" or "poset" operators? >>> Also, in _English_, math is called 'maths' ;) >> >> That's true in British English. American English uses "math". I'm not >> sure what the other dialects use. > > Math ith a Roman Catholic servith. But this is comp.lang.c, not comp.lang.lithp! -e -- 'sane', adj.: see 'unimaginative' on the web - http://jttlov.no-ip.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can function pointers be compared for equality "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-23 05:54 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-23 07:00 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-23 07:46 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-23 20:42 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 10:24 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:48 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:04 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:37 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-23 21:39 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:31 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-24 13:16 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 22:11 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 11:34 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-23 16:37 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 09:11 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 17:45 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 03:48 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 22:59 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 04:22 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:07 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-24 11:16 +0000
csiph-web