Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #16071

Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality

From ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality
Date 2012-01-23 20:42 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jfkgo9$dl2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <16c3fab7-bcd4-40dd-8208-93e7358dec1e@kn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <ad3ff3b8-b520-40f0-8e73-4a66a1426e37@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <8739b6zajt.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <20120123115909.372@kylheku.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/01/12 20:06, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> In English math terminology
<snip gibberish about equations>
Ok, maybe we should call them the "order" or "poset" operators?
Also, in _English_, math is called 'maths' ;)
-e
-- 
'sane', adj.: see 'unimaginative'
   on the web - http://jttlov.no-ip.org

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Can function pointers be compared for equality "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-23 05:54 -0800
  Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-23 07:00 -0800
    Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-23 07:46 -0800
      Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 +0000
        Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-23 20:42 +0000
          Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:04 -0500
            Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 10:24 +1300
              Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:48 -0500
              Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:04 -0800
                Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:37 -0800
            Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-23 21:39 +0000
            Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:31 -0800
              Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-24 13:16 +0000
          Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 22:11 +0000
            Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 11:34 +1300
    Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-23 16:37 +0000
    Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 09:11 -0800
      Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 -0500
        Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 17:45 -0800
          Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 03:48 +0000
            Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 22:59 -0500
              Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 04:22 +0000
                Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:07 -0800
                Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-24 11:16 +0000

csiph-web