Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality |
| Date | 2012-01-23 16:48 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4F1DD5B5.9040308@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <8739b6zajt.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <20120123115909.372@kylheku.com> <jfkgo9$dl2$1@dont-email.me> <4F1DCB5E.7080102@verizon.net> <9o61fhFbb0U2@mid.individual.net> |
On 01/23/2012 04:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 01/24/12 10:04 AM, James Kuyper wrote: >> On 01/23/2012 03:42 PM, ec429 wrote: >>> On 23/01/12 20:06, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >>>> In English math terminology >>> <snip gibberish about equations> >>> Ok, maybe we should call them the "order" or "poset" operators? >>> Also, in _English_, math is called 'maths' ;) >> >> That's true in British English. American English uses "math". I'm not >> sure what the other dialects use. > > In all those I'm aware of, "maths". Although a lot of what I see > referred to as "math" is just basic arithmetic. For me, most of what I heard called "maths" was at quite a bit higher level. :-) When I spent a year studying at Cambridge University, what I earned by passing the Mathematical Tripos was called a "Certificate of Advanced Study in Applied Mathematics". When I applied to various American grad schools, and later when I was applying for jobs, I always had to explain what it meant. In the US, "Applied Mathematics" is not normally understood to describe such things as general relativity and relativistic quantum field theory. Also, Certificates are not normally given out for graduate level work.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can function pointers be compared for equality "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-23 05:54 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-23 07:00 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-23 07:46 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-23 20:42 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 10:24 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:48 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:04 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:37 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-23 21:39 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:31 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-24 13:16 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 22:11 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 11:34 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-23 16:37 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 09:11 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 17:45 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 03:48 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 22:59 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 04:22 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:07 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-24 11:16 +0000
csiph-web