Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #4318
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Lilupophilupop |
| Date | 2012-01-08 15:49 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jecvg6$e2h$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <jea6ni$7g9$1@dont-email.me> <9mtldvFe7jU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <jec94t$3at$1@dont-email.me> <jecb2i$dti$1@dont-email.me> <jecjp4$21e$1@dont-email.me> |
On 1/8/2012 12:29 PM, Gregor Kofler wrote: > Am 2012-01-08 16:00, Jerry Stuckle meinte: >> On 1/8/2012 9:27 AM, Gregor Kofler wrote: >>> Am 2012-01-08 14:53, M. Strobel meinte: >>>> Am 07.01.2012 20:34, schrieb Gregor Kofler: >>>>> Am 2012-01-07 16:13, M. Strobel meinte: >>>>>> Am 07.01.2012 14:28, schrieb Gregor Kofler: >>>>>>> Am 2012-01-07 13:15, M. Strobel meinte: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> But it happens all the time. If you use tools/4GLs/CMSses you >>>>>>>> have to trust them, of course. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How can I "trust" (or "mistrust") 4GLs? >>>> >>>> Believe that the software does what it is meant to. >>>> Are you going to ask what I think it is meant to, or what I thing >>>> you think it is meant to? >>> >>> A 4th generation language can have bugs and allow exploits, just like >>> 3rd generation languages. Despite the version upgrade, you still have to >>> write scripts or programs (and care about security issues, which arise >>> in the scope of your script). A CMS is a ready-to-use product, that >>> *should* take care of such issues and rule out any security issues in >>> the scope of the scripts of the application. >>> >> >> Your reasoning is faulty. A 4GL should rule out security issues in the >> scope of the language. A CMS can also have bugs and allow exploits. > > I can't see any difference to 3GLs. Take the mentioned CF. It allows to > define the data type of supplied arguments for function calls. It allows > intrinsic escaping of query strings. Both features *can* (and should) be > used, but it's not obligatory (and they are not "enabled" by some > default setting). Not doing can and will lead to injections. It's more > or less the same thing as with PHP. > First of all, please study up on what a 3GL language is and what a 4GL language is (I won't get into it here - it's off topic in this newsgroup). >> And even with a CMS you have to write your own scripts. > > Pardon? You can, but you don't have to. No need to write scripts with > WordPress, Joomla!, Typo3, ... > I've used WordPress, Joomla and Drupal. In every one of them I've ended up writing code for my client because the plugins don't do what he wants. Of course, if you just tell the client he can only do what the addons allow, that's one thing. I prefer to satisfy the client's needs. >> Also, CMS's have had any number of security problems over the years, >> even within their own scope. > > Agreed. PHP-Nuke comes to my mind... > And WordPress and Joomla and Drupal and all kinds of others. >> I trust languages (even 4GL) much more than I do CMS's. > > So do I. > > Gregor > > -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lilupophilupop "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-07 13:15 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-07 08:15 -0500
Re: Lilupophilupop Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-07 18:27 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2012-01-07 18:52 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-07 16:02 -0500
Re: Lilupophilupop "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-01-10 18:31 -0600
Re: Lilupophilupop "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-11 09:29 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-11 08:42 -0500
Re: Lilupophilupop Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-11 15:23 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-01-07 14:28 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-07 16:13 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-07 18:03 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-01-07 20:34 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-08 14:53 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-01-08 15:27 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-08 10:00 -0500
Re: Lilupophilupop Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-01-08 18:29 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-08 15:49 -0500
Re: Lilupophilupop Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-01-08 22:59 +0100
Re: Lilupophilupop Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-08 17:38 -0500
csiph-web