Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #938

Re: NEC monitor

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/24/2011 04:36 PM, notbob wrote:
> I need a new monitor, my last CRT be a'dying.  I will cave and buy a
> new LCD.  My question is, how are the NEC LCD monitors.  I know that
> the older NEC CRT monitors were "brighter" than other monitors.  As a
> geezer with marginal eyesight, this is important.  Does that still
> apply to NEC LCD monitors?  I'll probably be going min 20" or larger.
> I use Slackware.  Don't see any compatibility issues.  Should I?  Any
> other suggested choices welcome.  Thank you and Merry Christmas. ;)
>
> nb
>
At 62, by some folks' reckoning I qualify for geezerhood, and while it's 
still pretty good my eyesight isn't what it was 30 years ago, either.

I bought a refurbished 23-inch Samsung LCD about seven months ago. I was 
using Mandriva 2010.2 back then, Mageia 1 now. The default out-of-the 
box brightness setting was WAY too high, much brighter than my old NEC 
XE21 CRT. I had to cut it about in half.

This is the only LCD I've used, so I can't compare it to any others. 
However, I think a Samsung would have all the brightness you require. I 
know I'm happy with mine, and another refurbished Samsung, this one a 
20-incher, is due to arrive here for my brother's computer Tuesday.

TJ

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-24 21:36 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-24 22:34 +0000
    Re: NEC monitor dk3uz@arrl.net (Edmund H. Ramm) - 2011-12-25 17:28 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-24 17:44 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 08:50 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 07:55 -0600
      Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:00 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-25 15:13 +0000
          Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 19:20 +0000
            Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-25 21:41 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 02:24 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2011-12-26 21:53 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2011-12-26 11:35 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 17:16 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-26 12:53 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 09:30 -0600
  Re: NEC monitor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-12-25 01:26 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor -rw------- <no@no.no> - 2011-12-25 02:09 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-25 02:27 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor Bill Waddington <william.waddington@beezmo.com> - 2011-12-25 07:49 -0800
  Re: NEC monitor david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-12-25 21:03 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-12-26 18:37 +0000

csiph-web