Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #941
| From | General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: NEC monitor |
| Date | 2011-12-25 02:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9lnfvkF3omU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnjfchen.3es.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:36:17 +0000, notbob wrote: > I need a new monitor, my last CRT be a'dying. I will cave and buy a new > LCD. My question is, how are the NEC LCD monitors. I know that the > older NEC CRT monitors were "brighter" than other monitors. As a geezer > with marginal eyesight, this is important. Does that still apply to NEC > LCD monitors? I'll probably be going min 20" or larger. I use > Slackware. Don't see any compatibility issues. Should I? Any other > suggested choices welcome. Thank you and Merry Christmas. ;) > > nb Get a 24" Monitor, it will be easier on your eyes and they are cheap. All monitors are compatible but HDMI connections do the best job of auto- configuring. Monitors all come with multiple connector types on them, at the very least they will have DVI and D-Sub but most modern monitors have HDMI also. All relatively modern graphics cards have DVI, new cards usually have HDMI also (look at the connectors on your card to see what's supported). If you buy a new card then make sure you get one that supports both DVI and HDMI. LED back lighting is also a feature you want. Check Newegg for reviews and for specials, today's special is 24" ASUS for $190 ($30 bucks off). Don't know if adjust-ability is important to you, if so then Dell's have really good height adjustments. If you want to attach to an arm then make sure that you get one that has VESA mounting support.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-24 21:36 +0000
Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-24 22:34 +0000
Re: NEC monitor dk3uz@arrl.net (Edmund H. Ramm) - 2011-12-25 17:28 +0000
Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-24 17:44 -0500
Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 08:50 -0500
Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 07:55 -0600
Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:00 -0500
Re: NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-25 15:13 +0000
Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 19:20 +0000
Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-25 21:41 +0000
Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 23:07 +0000
Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 02:24 +0000
Re: NEC monitor Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2011-12-26 21:53 +0000
Re: NEC monitor Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2011-12-26 11:35 +0000
Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 17:16 +0000
Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-26 12:53 -0500
Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 09:30 -0600
Re: NEC monitor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-12-25 01:26 +0000
Re: NEC monitor -rw------- <no@no.no> - 2011-12-25 02:09 +0000
Re: NEC monitor General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-25 02:27 +0000
Re: NEC monitor Bill Waddington <william.waddington@beezmo.com> - 2011-12-25 07:49 -0800
Re: NEC monitor david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-12-25 21:03 +0000
Re: NEC monitor ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-12-26 18:37 +0000
csiph-web