Re: NEC monitor

From	Bill Waddington <william.waddington@beezmo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: NEC monitor
Message-ID	<8dhef71jk4u6use4tjt69huo7cdadi5dgt@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<slrnjfchen.3es.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net>
Organization	Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
Date	2011-12-25 07:49 -0800

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 24 Dec 2011 21:36:17 GMT, notbob <notbob@nothome.com> wrote:

>I need a new monitor, my last CRT be a'dying.  I will cave and buy a
>new LCD.  My question is, how are the NEC LCD monitors.  I know that
>the older NEC CRT monitors were "brighter" than other monitors.  As a
>geezer with marginal eyesight, this is important.  Does that still
>apply to NEC LCD monitors?  I'll probably be going min 20" or larger.
>I use Slackware.  Don't see any compatibility issues.  Should I?  Any
>other suggested choices welcome.  Thank you and Merry Christmas. ;)

Here's a vote for Acer from another 62-year-old.  I've had Samsung
monitors that were nice too, but lately I've been buying Acer 22"
units.  Usually have to turn the brightness down.

Happy holidays,
Bill
-- 
William D Waddington
william.waddington@beezmo.com
"Even bugs...are unexpected signposts on
the long road of creativity..." - Ken Burtch

Thread

NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-24 21:36 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-24 22:34 +0000
    Re: NEC monitor dk3uz@arrl.net (Edmund H. Ramm) - 2011-12-25 17:28 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-24 17:44 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 08:50 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 07:55 -0600
      Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:00 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-25 15:13 +0000
          Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 19:20 +0000
            Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-25 21:41 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 02:24 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2011-12-26 21:53 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2011-12-26 11:35 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 17:16 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-26 12:53 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 09:30 -0600
  Re: NEC monitor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-12-25 01:26 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor -rw------- <no@no.no> - 2011-12-25 02:09 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-25 02:27 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor Bill Waddington <william.waddington@beezmo.com> - 2011-12-25 07:49 -0800
  Re: NEC monitor david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-12-25 21:03 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-12-26 18:37 +0000

csiph-web