Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #529
| From | tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] |
| Date | 2011-04-28 15:55 +0000 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <ipc2md$mml$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <000501cbf189$db2d6530$01fea8c0@dell8100> <ipbu08$72m$1@reader1.panix.com> |
In article <ipbu08$72m$1@reader1.panix.com>,
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@panix.com> wrote:
>
>not know but would tend to speculate likely not. I believe there
>is really, truly, a 300 fiber bundle running in from the street and
>that it's not actively multiplexed until that location. Maybe
>there are totally passive ways to do DWDM now so the passive "hubs"
>in the building actually have unpowered frequency multipliers/dividers
>in them -- I do not know.
I have looked into this a bit more; the above is not really correct in
two important respects.
1) The fiber "hubs" used by Verizon appear to be passive optical
beam splitters/combiners. The network is fully broadcast for
downstream communications with a link layer beneath any standard
Ethernet framing that emulates point-to-point Ethernet behavior
(it would certainly seem that since there is a single downstream
transmitter collisions really aren't possible so this should not
be hard). Downstream transmissions are encrypted so that, in theory,
only a specific ONT can decrypt them.
Upstream is a little funny. The upstream signal supposedly
propagates only towards the head end (how this is done optically
I do not know but I'm sure it's possible), so encryption is not
used. I don't know how the head end handles collisions though
it appears TDM in the upstream direction is used to attempt to
assure they do not occur.
2) Fully passive DWDM/CWDM equipment is, in fact, available from several
suppliers, but use of it in a PON deployment such as FiOS would be,
at least, not something that is standardized.
So, the diagram I have that shows VZ entering the building in question
with two fibers -- not 300 -- is almost certainly correct in that detail,
and I was speaking whereof I knew not.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@panix.com
And now he couldn't remember when this passion had flown, leaving him so
foolish and bewildered and astray: can any man?
William Styron
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] "AJB Consulting" <ajbcs@frontier.com> - 2011-04-02 19:01 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2011-04-04 02:44 +0000
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] John Stahl <aljon@stny.rr.com> - 2011-04-04 07:13 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2011-04-11 07:51 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2011-04-04 16:38 +0000
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] "Gary" <bogus-email@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-10 14:10 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) - 2011-04-30 13:02 +0000
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] "D. W." <indianut@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:39 -0700
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) - 2011-04-28 14:37 +0000
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2011-04-29 19:15 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] "Gary" <bogus-email@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-10 14:30 -0400
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) - 2011-04-28 14:35 +0000
Re: Does FiOS support rotary phones? [telecom] tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) - 2011-04-28 15:55 +0000
csiph-web