Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #871

Re: dat & msf versus mbox

From Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: dat & msf versus mbox
Date 2021-07-15 13:57 -0700
Message-ID <ilblptFmjrlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <il93e8F78oaU1@mid.individual.net> <ilbf3sFlbqvU1@mid.individual.net> <to0II.2769$5Y6.900@fx10.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


GG wrote:
> 
> When people use the words such as "insecure browser" they need to qualify their statement. 

We are talking about insecure OE and its old associated insecure browser 
IE 3-6 and its old associated insecure OS Wins up to XP; not Edge or Win 10.

I need to kf you and your html-ness.  I' had eliminated the html but not 
your persona yet.



-- 
Mike Easter

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 13:31 -0800
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-07-14 17:58 -0400
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 14:05 -0800
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-07-14 18:55 -0400
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2021-07-14 19:45 -0400
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 12:03 -0700
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 13:57 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 14:53 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-15 14:02 -0800
        Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 15:36 -0700

csiph-web