Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #871

Re: dat & msf versus mbox

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: dat & msf versus mbox
Date Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:57:32 -0700
Lines 14
Message-ID <ilblptFmjrlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <il93e8F78oaU1@mid.individual.net> <ilbf3sFlbqvU1@mid.individual.net> <to0II.2769$5Y6.900@fx10.iad>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net kYh/B3iP3i7jsfZ2jEqwMQvH1FW003ov9Do01qcENrSzZLI5ZC
Cancel-Lock sha1:HSJkSvOmi1NQDS+TVPFHCoels+I=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
In-Reply-To <to0II.2769$5Y6.900@fx10.iad>
Content-Language en-US
Xref csiph.com alt.comp.software.thunderbird:871

Show key headers only | View raw

GG wrote:
> 
> When people use the words such as "insecure browser" they need to qualify their statement. 

We are talking about insecure OE and its old associated insecure browser 
IE 3-6 and its old associated insecure OS Wins up to XP; not Edge or Win 10.

I need to kf you and your html-ness.  I' had eliminated the html but not 
your persona yet.



-- 
Mike Easter

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 13:31 -0800
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-07-14 17:58 -0400
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 14:05 -0800
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-07-14 18:55 -0400
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2021-07-14 19:45 -0400
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 12:03 -0700
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 13:57 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 14:53 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-15 14:02 -0800
        Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 15:36 -0700

csiph-web