Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #868

Re: dat & msf versus mbox

From Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: dat & msf versus mbox
Date 2021-07-15 12:03 -0700
Message-ID <ilbf3sFlbqvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <il93e8F78oaU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Bill Bradshaw wrote:
> I am posting from Outlook Express.
> I just like OE best

As someone who used OE for a very long time, including handling spam and 
malware with it and using an assortment of 3rd party crutches to 
overcome many of its weaknesses, IMO using OE (for anything) is a very 
bad idea.

I liked its comfort and interface, like an old shoe; but I got over that.

OE is tightly integrated w/ a very insecure browser which is tightly 
integrated w/ a very insecure OS.  It is dangerous and insecure.

-- 
Mike Easter

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 13:31 -0800
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-07-14 17:58 -0400
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-14 14:05 -0800
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-07-14 18:55 -0400
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2021-07-14 19:45 -0400
  Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 12:03 -0700
    Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 13:57 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 14:53 -0700
      Re: dat & msf versus mbox "Bill Bradshaw" <bradshaw@gci.net> - 2021-07-15 14:02 -0800
        Re: dat & msf versus mbox Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2021-07-15 15:36 -0700

csiph-web