Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
|---|---|
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
| Subject | Re: Net neutrality is dead |
| References | <20171121172949.029d3854.rsw@therandymon.com> <20171214144925.0009894c.rsw@therandymon.com> <f9gaf2Fu2gpU1@mid.individual.net> <1nh1nfh.1mixqlb13ob6ioN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <iejbge-6v7.ln1@raspberry.therandymon.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | 2017-12-15 01:00 +0000 |
On 2017-12-14, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2017-12-14, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:29:49 -0500 >> > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >> > >> > Well, congratulations to the oligarchs: they did it. >> > https://nypost.com/2017/12/14/fcc-repeals-landmark-net-neutrality-rules/ >> > >> > //-- clip >> > >> > WASHINGTON — The US Federal Communications Commission voted along party >> > lines Thursday to repeal landmark 2015 rules aimed at ensuring a free >> > and open internet, >> >> Sad now. > > Don't be sad, it's the way of the world. The money drives > everything; just accept that and it won't hurt so much. > So, according to that article, the article was: "everything was working fine prior to 2015, and then that scumbag Obama imposed this extra burden of regulation upon us, and it's not fair, waaa, waaa, waaah." But ostensibly that regulation was a reasonable safeguard. Just because no one had ever behaved badly doesn't preclude them from doing so. And in fact, in a weird, perverse way, somehow the freedom of having the rules lifted almost feels like an invitation to behave badly. Big money bought this government, and is now exacting the pound of flesh they feel they deserve. Airlines got a present this Xmas, now telecom has too. Oil and coal will get theirs soon enough, I'm sure. Getting tougher and tougher to be a start up these days, that's for sure: the big guns are doing what they can to close the doors of the walled garden, and get out the milking equipment.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-21 17:29 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-21 17:33 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-21 22:57 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 13:38 -0800
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-22 21:59 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-26 18:58 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-27 02:12 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-27 08:34 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-27 15:52 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2017-11-28 08:04 +0200
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-28 08:35 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-27 08:32 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2017-11-28 02:13 -0400
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-28 09:29 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-11-28 10:29 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-11-28 13:56 +0100
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail.com> - 2017-11-23 23:04 -0600
Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-14 14:49 -0500
Re: Net neutrality is dead Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-12-14 21:57 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2017-12-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-15 01:00 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-15 16:19 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2017-12-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Net neutrality is dead Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2017-12-16 01:55 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-16 21:24 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-12-17 10:15 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-17 14:54 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2017-12-17 18:27 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-20 10:19 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2017-12-23 14:57 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-18 00:12 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail.com> - 2017-12-17 19:25 -0600
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-20 02:02 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2017-12-20 19:18 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-23 03:50 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2018-06-11 14:29 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2018-06-12 12:34 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-18 12:05 +1000
csiph-web