Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Net neutrality demise |
| Date | 2017-11-28 09:29 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <f84ojhFrabjU8@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <ov4qp1$g97$1@dont-email.me> <ov4s0v$p9v$1@dont-email.me> <r11see-dlc.ln1@raspberry.therandymon.com> <f820s9F89riU4@mid.individual.net> <87r2sjszgp.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
On 2017-11-28, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:
>
> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>
>> Another reason for being glad one does not live in the USA. Still, now
>> we'll get to see if the aphorism that "the Internet treats censorship
>> as a fault and routes around it" is true or not.
>
> Does that explain why email I send from my account in NS to my wife [1]
> whose address is on another ISP based in Ontario is routed through the
> USA? Huh.
Not the same thing. That depends on where your ISP has bought bandwidth.
> I can't surmise if that sort of routing will give US service/backbone
> providers leverage to arm-twist Canadian ISPs into some new and odious
> fee structure.
In which case it will be worth Canadian ISPs setting up their own bandwidth.
IMNHO, the "net neutrality" thing will result in much less traffic being
routed through the USA.
> [1] Yes, she's two rooms away but URLs or full text for technical
> articles don't make for good shouted exchanges, let alone
> convivial fireside conversation. :-)
Two rooms? I email stuff to my wife who's sitting 5 feet to my left!
--
Today is Boomtime, the 40th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3183
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-21 17:29 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-21 17:33 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-21 22:57 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 13:38 -0800
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-22 21:59 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-26 18:58 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-27 02:12 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-27 08:34 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-11-27 15:52 -0500
Re: Net neutrality demise Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2017-11-28 08:04 +0200
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-28 08:35 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-27 08:32 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2017-11-28 02:13 -0400
Re: Net neutrality demise Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-11-28 09:29 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-11-28 10:29 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-11-28 13:56 +0100
Re: Net neutrality demise Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2017-11-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Net neutrality demise Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail.com> - 2017-11-23 23:04 -0600
Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-14 14:49 -0500
Re: Net neutrality is dead Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-12-14 21:57 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2017-12-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-15 01:00 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-15 16:19 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2017-12-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Net neutrality is dead Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2017-12-16 01:55 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-16 21:24 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2017-12-17 10:15 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-17 14:54 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2017-12-17 18:27 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2017-12-20 10:19 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2017-12-23 14:57 +0100
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2017-12-18 00:12 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail.com> - 2017-12-17 19:25 -0600
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-20 02:02 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2017-12-20 19:18 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2017-12-23 03:50 +0000
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2018-06-11 14:29 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2018-06-12 12:34 -0400
Re: Net neutrality is dead Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-18 12:05 +1000
csiph-web