Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #560053
| Subject | Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.computer.workshop, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | (12 earlier) <ThHIG.67536$iXb1.4658@fx03.ams1> <XnsABEDD3FDE75CFHT1@TP2vv5338EJ4xWGYnB6176y2D6KHSRjVi1ysa.eQUV68drJBT19X0Q9F2923sJ> <hm4qgsFrcn9U1@mid.individual.net> <0LfLG.202799$Og6.39693@fx01.ams1> <hm5h8aF1alhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| From | David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
| Message-ID | <higLG.11693$vJ6.10940@fx33.ams1> (permalink) |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | 2020-07-02 08:47 +0100 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 02/07/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: > David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> On 02/07/2020 02:10, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/1/20 5:45 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>> David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>> news:ThHIG.67536$iXb1.4658@fx03.ams1 Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:02:58 GMT >>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 24/06/2020 06:13, Diesel wrote: >>>>>> David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>>> news:37pIG.67387$iXb1.29833@fx03.ams1 Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:22:38 >>>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/06/2020 10:34, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>> He took something I wrote, entirely out context, didn't bother >>>>>>>> to understand nay a word of it; see where I wrote 'something' >>>>>>>> and 'program' later? I was writing in a general sense! Your >>>>>>>> friend either didn't realize that (how could you not?) or does, >>>>>>>> and still tried to use it to backup their BS story! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Show me a post where I clarified I only had the compiled code >>>>>>>> after "being called out" for it, David. I can't seem to find >>>>>>>> any. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seriously, you want my help with the bot? Want me to work with >>>>>>>> others, instead of solo and share info, etc? I want something >>>>>>>> from you, then. A show of honesty, a good gesture on your part, >>>>>>>> for old times, then. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't cover for your friend, Snit. Call him out for lying about >>>>>>>> me. You *cannot* claim what he wrote isn't exactly what I'm >>>>>>>> writing that it is, David. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to bang both of your heads together! :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> :) You have no idea how much I'd like the ability to have >>>>>> :physical >>>>>> contact with you for a few moments. Oh the discussion we'd have. >>>>>> rofl. >>>>> >>>>> I think you mean that you'd like to beat me - like your parents >>>>> did to you as a child? >>>> >>>> David, I won't deny the thought has crossed my mind on several >>>> occasions; what I'd do if I ever met you in person. Sure. That being >>>> said, I always found myself coming back to the reasonable decision; the >>>> only reasonable decision, talk to you, try to explain things to you in >>>> person. I think alot of our initial problem stemmed from a >>>> misunderstanding, or a series of them. >>> >>> The same is true with you and I. We had some misunderstandings. >>> >>> I want to move forward in peace. >> >> Me too. >> >>> To you it is of paramount importance that I "admit", whether I agree or >>> not, to your view of things. And since I do not agree this means you >>> need to me to lie. When this is pointed out you go back to you merely >>> need me to agree to your view. Which is what I keep saying. >>> >>> You have a story you tell yourself about how you are some amazing >>> hero... and key to your story is you need a villain. A capable and >>> worthy villain. In that way you flatter David and I by selecting us as >>> the villains in your personal story, but it is not a role I want, nor >>> one I think David wants. >>> >>> Why not just move forward? OK, we disagreed in the past. We each think >>> the other was wrong, even dishonest. So? It is not like I am asking you >>> to marry me -- I merely want civility. >> >> :-D >> >>> I have asked repeatedly -- but you so far have not accepted that as a >>> possibility. >>> >>> Do you know what it would take for you to grow to the point you could? >>> If so perhaps I can help you get there (or not -- I certainly make no >>> promises). >> >> It really is most kind of you to offer to help Diesel. > > While there is certainly an adversarial (though playful) tone toward him > the offer is sincere. Noted! We have much in common! ;-) >> I'm not too good at following the long discourses you two have 'enjoyed' >> but I did think that Diesel was going to determine who was making the >> flood posts. I never thought he was responsible in any way for /making/ >> such posts. I don't think YOU thought so either. > > Correct. It shocked me when he spoke of decompiling in response to my > comments about the bot. He has long since said he did not mean to imply he > had the code or executable, and I have said I have no belief he does for > almost as long. > > He for some reason needs me to say I agree with him on details of that > misunderstanding of which I don’t agree. It is odd — similar to if I > insisted he apologize for falsely assuming I built my view of him blindly > based on what you said (paraphrasing). He was wrong. But so what? Certainly > not worth demanding he agree with me he was in error and apologize. Hell, > he can still hold onto that incorrect belief and I would still want peace. I don't want him to hurt you in any way just because you and I are pals. Perhaps he's just been too busy with other things to investigate Carroll's involvement. D.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-06-24 05:13 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-06-23 22:34 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 13:02 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 21:52 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 07:26 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-01 18:10 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:09 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 07:38 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:47 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 08:18 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 09:33 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 12:12 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough D. Moen <dmoenfactual4@email.net> - 2020-07-02 15:51 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 20:53 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 16:00 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2020-07-03 08:53 -0300
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:05 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:53 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:50 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 06:39 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 03:46 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:36 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:44 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:50 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:53 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 14:43 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 15:59 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-07-04 01:08 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Jose Soto <emaildumps127.0.1@noemail4me.net> - 2020-07-04 08:23 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
csiph-web