Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #459085
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies |
| Date | 2018-05-24 18:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fmo6lpFrf6vU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <dd367aa6-0612-48a2-9a22-8faa985dac21@googlegroups.com> <flm7o5FakcoU1@mid.individual.net> <dcb40b03-0e0d-4606-97b6-e23e24af2579@googlegroups.com> <fmj6crFnep3U1@mid.individual.net> <469f8e27-03d4-4dd6-8579-82331adf4ecc@googlegroups.com> |
Am 23.05.2018 um 21:42 schrieb Edward Prochak: > On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 2:38:22 PM UTC-4, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 15.05.2018 um 21:22 schrieb Edward Prochak: > [] >>> >>> So at least you are being honest here, you dislike the BB theory, >>> so rather than providing evidence proving it wrong, you prefer >>> ad hominem attacks on its discoverer. >>> >>> That's not science, that's politics. >> >> (Your forgot religion, since he was actually a priest). > > So perhaps besides not accepting the BB theory, > you are also against religion? > >> >> So what do you have against my argument? > > I'll repeat: > your argument is flawed. It is an ad hominem attack. > >> >> I wrote, that his 'career' looks like being 'staged'. > > "looks like" is not a valid a argument. > >> >> This is something for a scientist. But you are apparently willing to >> trust a person about his scientific discovery in a field, were his >> academic degree looks dubious? > > I am willing to trust the work he produced. > When journals referee an article for publication, do you think > they should include standards for educational level? > for IQ level? For current job title? for religious affiliation? > For minimum age? for degree field? > >> >> How certain could we be, that he made this discovery himself (in person)? > > now another frivolous argument. > If someone else was involved, they have the right to claim > a share in the discovery. In these many years no one had made > such a claim. So this is irrelevant. > We have this phenomenon in various instances: someone made a discovery and someone else is rewarded for this. Usually we want to know the painter (for instance) of a certain masterpiece of art or the composer of a piece of music, the singer of a nice song or the author of a story. But my guess is, that in nine out of ten case we are presented with someone else. The person famed for a certain achievement is most likely involved in some sort of club, which has the power to present to the stupid public whomever they want. Such cases are almost never 'blown'. But sometimes they are and we find, that painters didn't paint or singers didn't sing. (In a few cases the entire person seems to be fabricated.) TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-03 19:00 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 18:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-04 08:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-04 16:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 15:28 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-05 05:27 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-05 09:27 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:59 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-06 10:26 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-07 12:18 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:07 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-08 00:28 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-08 19:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 20:40 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-09 09:23 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-09 07:40 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-10 20:15 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-10 13:35 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 06:29 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-11 21:03 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-12 00:22 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-12 13:34 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-12 20:23 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-13 07:09 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:21 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-13 09:33 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:47 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:55 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:50 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-17 12:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-17 13:37 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 13:24 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-18 21:01 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:02 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-19 12:20 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:26 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-22 20:38 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-05-22 12:12 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:16 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:42 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-24 18:13 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 06:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:08 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:18 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:40 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-08 16:47 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 10:52 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:16 -0700
Re:Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-07 19:11 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-07 21:49 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-25 19:29 +0200
csiph-web