Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450998

Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops
Date 2018-05-09 19:57 -0700
Message-ID <flhqo3Fanp7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <611f2d6a-e678-4d7d-b066-57535409397c@googlegroups.com> <flh6k0F6olrU2@mid.individual.net> <1a3b83e5-1057-42fa-965f-346ffb145740@googlegroups.com> <flhga0F8p7pU1@mid.individual.net> <e4efb4a8-e8c0-4008-aefa-394141187ad5@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/9/18 5:33 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 5:58:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> 
> (snip)
> 
>>>>> You call that thread (with very few people in it) in where many (most?)
>>>>> are saying they don't care,  "the norm"? And the only guy that agreed
>>>>> with you has no FB history:"Jon Christopher Spoonamore"
>>>>
>>>> Many in that discussion show understanding, and I could not care less
>>>> about the history of the people responding.
>>>
>>> LOL! You seem to have forgotten you just called them "the norm".
>>
>> Ah, you are splitting hairs, but sure... a "fair" nit, as far as
>> silly little nits go. People understanding and caring about this
>> issue, which impacts productivity, efficiency, and error-reduction,
>> is clearly common. And for those who are not as concerned it seems
>> uncommon, outside of COLA, to attack or insult those that do have a
>> decent understanding of the issue. 
> 
> Not a single hair needed splitting to point out 4 people aren't "the norm".
> 
What four people do you even mean?

And interesting how I was exactly right about your showing NO 
understanding about the comments of the competing system you talked about.

You are back to just snipping all content that proves you wrong... then 
insisting you are right. Funny to watch.

And what you snipped:

While the macOS environment is FAR from perfect in this area, there are 
times you want inconsistency. The real issue is the proper use of 
consistency (and inconsistency if you will). It is doing so with purpose 
and based on what the research shows works. Still, you are right to note 
macOS is far from perfect here... for example file dialogs (open and 
save) are FAIRLY consistent but far from perfect even with Apple 
programs (heck, look at the ones from iMovie to see a fine bit of 
insanity). The iMovie UI disaster is one reason I prefer other video 
editing tools.

Still, even with iMovie (what I consider to be a pretty big "error" in 
terms of UI), the level of consistency with the rest of the system is 
pretty amazing. Just some things:

* Menu names and placements. The menu, of course, is where macOS menus 
almost always are, and the terms are the same: without even looking, if 
you are familiar with macOS, you know where the "Preferences" are and 
that they are called that and not "options" or the like, you know where 
"Quit" is and what it will be called (and that you can opt to quit 
keeping windows or not), you know the Share menu item will give you 
options where it makes sense to share your video, you know where to find 
the version information.

* With all or at least most of that, you know the hot keys. For example,
you know what hot key will take you to preferences or to do even rather 
"obscure" things like get to Emoji and symbols if you are adding text.

* You know what the Share icon will look like and (at least roughly) 
what it will do.

* You know that the file dialogs, as "odd" as some are (Import Media), 
will have the "action" button on the far right and the "no action" 
option to the left of that.

* You know that when you go to import an image you will be able to look 
for it by Album or People or Places or the like.

Now iMovie does have an inconsistent color -- a darker theme. This makes 
sense though given the context (though carrying this over the the file 
dialogs seems odd). The fact Photos does NOT have this except for in its 
Edit mode is rather absurd, really. That is a case where an inconsistent 
UI (or at least the option for one) would be a benefit and Apple fails 
to provide it (or if they do I am not aware of it).

Sigh... and that is a LOT to go over to have you, likely, give some 
variation of "nuh uh" in response. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

(lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-09 04:26 +0000
  Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:11 -0700
  Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 22:15 -0700
    Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 23:13 -0700
  Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:48 -0500
    Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:11 -0700
      Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-09 20:07 +0000
        Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 13:34 -0700
        Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 13:59 -0700
          Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:06 -0700
          Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:09 -0700
            Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:10 -0700
            Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 14:15 -0700
            Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-10 07:41 +0000
              Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 07:49 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 08:12 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:23 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:30 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:34 -0700
              Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:24 -0500
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:24 -0700
              Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 20:17 +0000
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 13:24 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-10 17:34 -0400
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 14:36 -0700
      Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:05 -0700
        Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 14:13 -0700
          Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:52 -0700
            Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 16:58 -0700
              Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:33 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 19:45 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 21:05 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 23:10 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 19:57 -0700
            Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 09:14 -0700
              Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 09:44 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 09:48 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 09:59 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 10:17 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 10:27 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 11:26 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:11 -0700
                Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 11:24 -0700
  Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 20:14 +0000
    Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 13:23 -0700
    Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-10 22:55 +0000
      Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 16:05 -0700
      Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 02:58 +0000
        Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-11 07:23 -0400
          Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 05:45 -0700
        Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:22 -0500
      Re: (lack of) Consistency in commercial desktops William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-05-11 13:36 +0100

csiph-web