Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #645225

Re: Quantum Gravity ?????

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Quantum Gravity ?????
Date 2017-08-09 11:40 +1000
Message-ID <euv7fjF4kh7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <baafe545-62e6-41b9-bb94-a91e935f3652@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
> 

This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 11:21 -0700
  Re: Quantum Gravity ????? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-09 11:40 +1000
    Re: Quantum Gravity ????? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 21:43 -0400
    Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 10:19 -0700
      Re: Quantum Gravity ????? pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-08-09 12:26 -0700
        Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 15:45 -0700
          Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-09 18:09 -0700
      Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-09 14:03 -0700
  Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-08 22:29 -0700

csiph-web