Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #645155 > unrolled thread

Quantum Gravity ?????

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 11:21 -0700
    Re: Quantum Gravity ????? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-09 11:40 +1000
      Re: Quantum Gravity ????? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 21:43 -0400
      Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 10:19 -0700
        Re: Quantum Gravity ????? pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-08-09 12:26 -0700
          Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 15:45 -0700
            Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-09 18:09 -0700
        Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-09 14:03 -0700
    Re: Quantum Gravity ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-08 22:29 -0700

#645155 — Quantum Gravity ?????

How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#645225

On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
> 

This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645226

On 8/8/2017 9:40 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration 
>> of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 
>> times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very 
>> tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot 
>> of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I 
>> would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain 
>> gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
>>
> 
> This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.
> 
> Sylvia.

Come on Sylvia, it fits! It's right on the money!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645302

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 6:40:09 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
> > 
> 
> This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.
> 
> Sylvia.

Spinning at c of electrons is my own theory.It is now being accepted.Sylvia my thinking is beyond your knowledge. Beyond,and over your head. What its telling is where light gets its speed of c.That is reality.Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645312

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:19:31 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 6:40:09 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
> > > 
> > 
> > This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.
> > 
> > Sylvia.
> 
> Spinning at c of electrons is my own theory.It is now being accepted.Sylvia my thinking is beyond your knowledge. Beyond,and over your head. What its telling is where light gets its speed of c.That is reality.Trebert

Tell us what "spinning at c" is in RPMs.
You can't.  The fact that you can't should tell you that "spinning at c" is nonsense.
But you're not smart enough to realize that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645337

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 12:26:37 PM UTC-7, pcard...@volcanomail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:19:31 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 6:40:09 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > On 9/08/2017 4:21 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > > How does it give weight to particles? Fermi Lab. proved acceleration of electron to 99.000000000000000000 of c increases its weight 70,000 times its rest mass WOW.Electron's rest mass weight must be very tiny.Still my spin theory has it spinning at c,and that gives it a lot of push back.Think gyro spinning at c.  I'm not to up on stringsbut I would like to ask Greene how string theorycan be used to explain gravity in the quantum realm?  TreBert
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This is gibberish - "spinning at c" has no meaning.
> > > 
> > > Sylvia.
> > 
> > Spinning at c of electrons is my own theory.It is now being accepted.Sylvia my thinking is beyond your knowledge. Beyond,and over your head. What its telling is where light gets its speed of c.That is reality.Trebert
> 
> Tell us what "spinning at c" is in RPMs.
> You can't.  The fact that you can't should tell you that "spinning at c" is nonsense.
> But you're not smart enough to realize that.

Its photons.You are to low witted to understand what I post.Its way over your head.Your sitting on your brain.Sad but true  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645363

Glazier, you Un-American Liberal Mooch, Face Shitter &
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> aka
you, ___ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim___, how
many NEW posters did you snare, deviously, with your
idiotic Gutter physics & filthy Glazierola, who falsely
believed that they could educate you, you, Glazier who
was kicked out of school in the 4th grade!?.... LOL
>
Glazier, did you tell these respondents that your real goal
is to tell them the same thing that you told...
(2)
On 06Dec2014, to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert.... & addinng
On 03Aug2017:
benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears.
>
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Jew Pig Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
Glazier, you filthy, hate mongering Swine, your "nice" posts
do not belong into s.p. Post your Glazierola into your
<http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017>, until
you accept <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>,
as you wait for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>.
who has a gruesome end in store for you, Glazier. "It's a pity"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645320

<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> aka
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
& furiously posts his sanctimonious Shit & Glazierola
to cover up that he is a Hatemonger & a Face Shitter
& <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
refusing <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645244

Yo, SwineBert, all you need to know is that so far, you
have not shown the spine nor the decency to accept
<http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve> but
prefer to put a Stain-of-Shame onto your family for you
being <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web