Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag

Message-ID	<598A54F4.5149@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2017-08-08 17:19 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag
References	<5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com> <qJidnTR0WPkQbhXEnZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <204dae23-7056-4e46-997c-b0f2ce880323@googlegroups.com> <598a4814$0$61097$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> <1bde78e6-c5de-47c5-850c-10f9bfabb541@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, HÃ¤gar wrote:
> > >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> > >>
> > >> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > >> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > >>
> > >> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > >
> > > Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > >
> > > Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > >
> > > Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > >
> > > One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > >
> > > Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > >
> > Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> > all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> > supervisors needed!
> 
> Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> mathematics, elocution, health...
> Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> 
> Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> Benj is the most piteous.
> Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> Containing all that is shittious.
> 
> Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> with
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee



What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?



How about 7/11?

Thread

Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-07 13:50 -0700
  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-07 13:59 -0700
  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-07 16:11 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 22:31 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-08 14:35 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 19:24 -0400
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 16:31 -0700
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 17:19 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 21:50 -0400
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:34 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:56 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:11 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-09 11:36 -0700
  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-07 18:27 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-07 20:06 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-08 00:27 -0400
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.com> - 2017-08-08 10:21 -0500
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-08 12:02 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-08 10:42 -0500
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-09 21:15 +0200
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-09 15:16 -0700
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-09 15:16 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 22:44 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-10 09:57 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-10 15:17 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-10 15:38 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-10 16:59 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 12:20 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 00:22 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 01:01 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 14:36 -0700
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-09 23:43 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 10:56 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 11:47 -0700
  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-08 14:32 +1000

csiph-web