Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403587
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Calculating G |
| Date | 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ecpc3vF3d5gU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <5ed3eefc-efcc-4756-8d78-7cc30ef9b9de@googlegroups.com> <econe0FtfjeU1@mid.individual.net> <3db9f70e-139b-41a3-8180-daaac1e36a1a@googlegroups.com> <ecp8jsF2i6rU1@mid.individual.net> <b6a2ec8b-4331-4218-9fe7-68da756eed5a@googlegroups.com> |
On 31/12/2016 8:18 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 4:29:51 PM UTC+8, Sylvia Else > wrote: >> On 31/12/2016 6:15 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: >>> On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 11:36:35 AM UTC+8, Sylvia Else >>> wrote: >>>> On 31/12/2016 2:31 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also I have established that the observed/calculated g and M >>>>> of the AC stars are incorrect as reported in the literature. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Which literature? Cite. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> The values I used were from the Internet. I found g for the Alpha >>> Centauris not accurate. No problem as it is irrelevant. >>> >> >> You do realise that the Internet is not peer reviewed? It is also >> not conventionally referred to as "the literature". >> >> You may have found a site that contains some incorrect numbers, >> that's all. >> >> Sylvia. > > The Internet gives references to the literature. It doesn't pull it > out of the air. Many elements of stars however are presented as fact > by consensus experts when in fact they are only assumptions. If the > values I used for gstar, rstar and Mstar are wrong, do you know more > correct ones? > If you have references, given to you by the Internet, then cite them. Otherwise readers have no way to know where you're getting your numbers from. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-29 19:02 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-29 22:22 -0800
Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 12:13 +0100
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-30 22:35 +1100
Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 13:03 +0100
Re: Calculating G mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-30 04:11 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 14:32 -0800
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 15:17 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 16:51 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 12:48 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 19:31 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 14:36 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:15 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 19:29 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 01:18 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 19:06 -0800
Re: Calculating G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:33 -0800
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 19:41 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:17 -0800
csiph-web