Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600147
| From | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? |
| Date | 2016-10-09 18:50 +0000 |
| Organization | enemygadgets.com |
| Message-ID | <e5vhrcFto9tU7@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ntdna7$t3i$1@dont-email.me> <e5v6cbFr7cbU1@mid.individual.net> <ntdpm1$64m$2@dont-email.me> <e5vgv7Fto9tU2@mid.individual.net> <nte3ba$9ui$1@dont-email.me> |
Poutnik wrote: >>>> There is no reference point to conclude you have >>>> linear motion which is why the OFF state is >>>> given to objects travelling at speed of light. >>> >>> ANd this is total nonsense. >> >> That is for you to prove and not declare. > > No, you have made a statement > in direct contradiction with Special relativity, > so it is on you to prove... So I'm breaking special relativity. Here is my write up of it: Linear motion as a quantum property? ------------------------------------ I don't understand any of this. I'm trying to figure out linear motion as a property of matter. But now I'm really stuck. Basically it starts off by concluding linear motion reduces to a property of matter. In order for it to be a property, it can only be ON or OFF. The OFF state is anything that travel at the speed of light contrary to where I want to start :( There is no reference point to conclude you have linear motion which is why the OFF state is given to objects travelling at speed of light. Then what does ON mean? It seems to mean that when these particles combine with other object and they face each other then you get the ON state. This logic just sucks and sucks. When two objects face each other to cancel linear motion they stand still. And when they combine with more collections of such particles you get various linear motion vectors. The moment a particle has one of its linear motion particle properties reversed in a particle collision of high energy, it is possible, they just accelerate until its torn to pieces. If that is the case, then may be some day we can reverse the properties of just a few particles by just a little and hold on to it some way. A sheet of this material would then accelerate slowly assuming the force of acceleration can be evenly distributed throughout the material (otherwise it would rip itself to pieces if it is a point source). Much like a sheet of plastic can be charged up electrostatically or some materials form into magnets, this material will accelerate in the specific directions set into at the time its manufactured, and you point it in the direction you want to travel.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 12:59 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 15:16 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:12 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:21 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:33 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:34 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:01 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:39 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:53 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:09 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:47 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:50 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:54 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:12 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "Richard D. Saam" <rdsaam@att.net> - 2016-10-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 17:42 +0200
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 08:53 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 03:14 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:19 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:19 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-10 13:10 -0400
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:15 +0000
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 10:26 -0400
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:14 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? THE STINGER - AKA 'KING OF AUK' <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 09:43 +0200
space hath atoms, secondpower of the speed of light numerosity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:58 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 11:38 -0700
Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-10 11:46 -0700
csiph-web