Re: Linear motion as a quantum property?

From	7 <7@enemygadgets.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Linear motion as a quantum property?
Date	2016-10-09 15:34 +0000
Organization	enemygadgets.com
Message-ID	<e5v6cbFr7cbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<e5ut8nFp229U1@mid.individual.net> <ntdfu3$3u5$1@dont-email.me> <e5v52eFqrr0U1@mid.individual.net> <ntdna7$t3i$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

>>> Linear motion ( like of argon atoms in air )
>>> is not quantized, therefore is is not quantum property.
>> 
>> Argon atoms are quantum objects.
> 
> Sure they are, but linear motion is not quantum property,
> as it is not property of the object, quantum or not.
>> 
>>> Also, linear motion is relative phenomena,
>>> as there is no absolute linear motion nor rest.
>> 
>> Which is why you should read the original post:
> 
> What did make you imply I had not ?

This is a post trying to say linear motion could
be quantized. You seem to justify it is continuous
without explaining why.
Hence you forgot to read and take in the original post.

> I was sliding to nonsense.

More reasons to read the original post
and absorb the details before posting:

Linear motion as a quantum property?
------------------------------------

I don't understand any of this.

I'm trying to figure out linear motion as a property
of matter. But now I'm really stuck.

Basically it starts off by concluding linear
motion reduces to a property of matter.

In order for it to be a property, it can only
be ON or OFF.

The OFF state is anything that travel at the speed of light
contrary to where I want to start :(

There is no reference point to conclude you have
linear motion which is why the OFF state is
given to objects travelling at speed of light.

Then what does ON mean?

It seems to mean that when these particles
combine with other object and they face each other
then you get the ON state.

This logic just sucks and sucks.

When two objects face each other to cancel linear
motion they stand still.
And when they combine with more collections of such
particles you get various linear motion vectors.

The moment a particle has one of its linear motion
particle properties reversed in a particle collision of high 
energy, it is possible, they just accelerate until
its torn to pieces.

If that is the case, then may be some day we can reverse
the properties of just a few particles by just a little and hold 
on to it some way.

A sheet of this material would then accelerate slowly
assuming the force of acceleration can be evenly
distributed throughout the material (otherwise it would
rip itself to pieces if it is a point source).

Much like a sheet of plastic can be charged up
electrostatically or some materials form into magnets,
this material will accelerate in the specific directions
set into at the time its manufactured, and you
point it in the direction you want to travel.

Thread

Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 12:59 +0000
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 15:16 +0200
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:12 +0000
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:21 +0200
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:33 +0200
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:34 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:01 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:39 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:53 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:09 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:35 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:47 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:50 +0000
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:54 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:12 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:37 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:51 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "Richard D. Saam" <rdsaam@att.net> - 2016-10-09 18:42 -0500
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 17:42 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 08:53 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 03:14 -0700
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:19 +0000
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:19 -0700
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-10 13:10 -0400
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:15 +0000
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 10:26 -0400
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:14 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? THE STINGER - AKA 'KING OF AUK' <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 09:43 +0200
    space hath atoms, secondpower of the speed of light numerosity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:58 -0700
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 11:38 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-10 11:46 -0700

csiph-web