Re: Linear motion as a quantum property?

From	7 <7@enemygadgets.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Linear motion as a quantum property?
Date	2016-10-10 21:15 +0000
Organization	enemygadgets.com
Message-ID	<e62enpFkr9vU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<e5ut8nFp229U1@mid.individual.net> <jKCdnf5ouOTxVmbKnZ2dnUU7-I3NnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Yousuf Khan wrote:

> On 10/9/2016 8:59 AM, 7 wrote:
>> Linear motion as a quantum property?
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> I don't understand any of this.
>>
>> I'm trying to figure out linear motion as a property
>> of matter. But now I'm really stuck.
>>
>> Basically it starts off by concluding linear
>> motion reduces to a property of matter.
> 
> Linear motion isn't a property of matter.

What I'm saying is there is a framework for making it
a property of matter if the OFF property is
inherited when objects travel at speed of light.

The ON property is inherited by letting two OFF particles
face each other.

By working it that way, it can be thought of as a property.

Linear motion as a quantum property?
------------------------------------

I don't understand any of this.

I'm trying to figure out linear motion as a property
of matter. But now I'm really stuck.

Basically it starts off by concluding linear
motion reduces to a property of matter.

In order for it to be a property, it can only
be ON or OFF.

The OFF state is anything that travel at the speed of light
contrary to where I want to start :(

There is no reference point to conclude you have
linear motion which is why the OFF state is
given to objects travelling at speed of light.

Then what does ON mean?

It seems to mean that when these particles
combine with other object and they face each other
then you get the ON state.

This logic just sucks and sucks.

When two objects face each other to cancel linear
motion they stand still.
And when they combine with more collections of such
particles you get various linear motion vectors.

The moment a particle has one of its linear motion
particle properties reversed in a particle collision of high 
energy, it is possible, they just accelerate until
its torn to pieces.

If that is the case, then may be some day we can reverse
the properties of just a few particles by just a little and hold 
on to it some way.

A sheet of this material would then accelerate slowly
assuming the force of acceleration can be evenly
distributed throughout the material (otherwise it would
rip itself to pieces if it is a point source).

Much like a sheet of plastic can be charged up
electrostatically or some materials form into magnets,
this material will accelerate in the specific directions
set into at the time its manufactured, and you
point it in the direction you want to travel.

> Quantum spin is a property of
> matter and other particles. The quantum spin combined with linear motion
> produces a chiral (i.e. corkscrew) motion. The particles that travel at
> the speed of light will always have a single direction of motion,
> therefore their chirality is always in the same direction. Particles
> that don't travel at the speed of light, will always have the same
> direction of quantum spin, but they will go back and forth (i.e.
> vibrate), and this will produce left and right chirality during
> different phases of their travel. Due to a quirk of the Weak Force, only
> left-chiral particles interact with the Higgs field, while the
> right-chiral particles do not. This is what gives particles their mass,
> but doesn't give them so much mass that they can't move at all. So the
> particles get mass in one direction, but not the other.
> 
> Yousuf Khan

Thread

Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 12:59 +0000
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 15:16 +0200
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:12 +0000
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:21 +0200
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:33 +0200
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 15:34 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:01 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:39 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:53 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:09 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:35 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:47 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:50 +0000
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:54 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:12 +0000
          Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:02 +0200
            Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-09 18:37 +0000
              Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:51 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "Richard D. Saam" <rdsaam@att.net> - 2016-10-09 18:42 -0500
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 17:42 +0200
                Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 08:53 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-10 03:14 -0700
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:19 +0000
        Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:19 -0700
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-10 13:10 -0400
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-10 21:15 +0000
      Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 10:26 -0400
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 00:14 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? THE STINGER - AKA 'KING OF AUK' <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 09:43 +0200
    space hath atoms, secondpower of the speed of light numerosity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:58 -0700
  Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 11:38 -0700
    Re: Linear motion as a quantum property? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-10 11:46 -0700

csiph-web