Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #382170

Re: Particle Physics

Show all headers | View raw

Am 23.04.2016 07:25, schrieb JanPB:

>>>
>>>> I wonder if universities have a special department for caring about the
>>>> subsequent mental trauma of physics student, after they went through an
>>>> introduction into theoretical physics.
>>>
>>> Yes, they have such a department. It's called the Administration
>>> Department. It presents to the student a document to inform
>>> them that they have failed to pass the introduction to
>>> theoretical physics. The idea is that the student realizes that
>>> they don't have what it takes.
>>> There must be *some* kind of filter, no?
>>
>>
>> Let's assume, that 'The Physics department' operates similar to a
>> satanic sect.
>>
>> There should be filters, of course, that keep insufficient candidates
>> from peeping into the inner sanctum.
>>
>> Such filters are the 'Eat shit tests'.
>>
>> Once the candidate swallows all bs, put in from of them, they are worthy
>> to promote to the next level.
>>
>> Who does not absorb any nonsense or even rejects illogic assumptions -
>> let alone question the authority of the master druids - gets kicked out
>> of the Holy Sect.
>>
>> The bullshit is carefully crafted to generate metal trauma and make
>> candidates grab any kind of resting spot, where they could eventually
>> sort things out.
>>
>> But rest is not granted, neither cure, since the candidate must REALLY
>> believe the nonsense and be able to reproduce it convincingly at any
>> given moment.
>>
>> That is another test. And once the candidate masters to utter crap
>> convincingly, he gets to yet another level in that multi-leveled
>> bullshit castle.
>>
>> Sure, some basic techniques are also required, like knowing ho to turn a
>> knob on a device and how to multiply two numbers.
>>
>> These techniques are useful by themselves, but not by the content on
>> what they are trained.
>>
>> The 'real thing' (the inner sanctum) is entered only, if at least a few
>> levels are mastered and once to candidate has proven loyalty to the
>> superior sorcerers.
>>
>> Than eventually there will be a few bits of real wisdom spread sparsely
>> upon the apprentices of witchcraft.
>>
>> TH
>
> A standard rant of a guy frustrated by his lack of talent for this sort of thing. Just pick
> a different hobby.

I compare parts of the 'physics community' to an occult sect. This is my 
impression, since I know a few physicists, that behave similar to how 
occultists behave.

The 'community' seems to follow certain patterns, which I assume to be 
common among sects. This is why I try to estimate, whether or not 
certain patterns fall also into what I assume about satanism.

Well, this is - to say the least - not a 'usual rant'.

So lets compare physics to religion.

First question would be, if physics has anything in common with 
religious believes.

And, sure, religion HAS certain aspects, which are also covered by 
natural sciences (like origin of the universe).

But do academic circles share similarities to a sect?

Actually I would say: yes they do.

The entire academic system resembles somehow an obscure 'church'. And 
the higher echelons of physics look and behave quite like sorcerers.

If there also brain-washing techniques used, then this would make the 
science similar to a sect, which is not based on the real world, but 
tries to perpetuate the occult society itself.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Particle Physics Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 17:09 -0700
  Re: Particle Physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 19:42 -0700
    Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-22 06:42 +0200
      Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:14 -0500
        Re: Particle Physics David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:01 -0700
        Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-22 19:49 +0200
          Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:06 -0500
            Re: Particle Physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-23 01:37 +0200
          Re: Particle Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-22 13:35 -0500
            Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-22 22:29 +0200
              Re: Particle Physics Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-04-22 23:32 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-23 06:15 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 22:25 -0700
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-23 23:18 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:55 -0500
              Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
                Re: Particle Physics Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-04-23 15:53 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-23 20:36 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:59 -0500
              Re: Particle Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-23 16:43 -0500
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-24 07:16 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:02 -0500
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-25 06:55 +0200
                Re: Particle Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:07 -0500
                Re: Particle Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-04-26 22:24 +0200

csiph-web