Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2070784
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love |
| Date | 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk2o3dFjtdlU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <979mlm.de1.17.2@news.alt.net> <dk06qvF31nU3@mid.individual.net> <97bjdl.ise.19.1@news.alt.net> <dk2cugFh1lbU1@mid.individual.net> <97dto6.ii.19.1@news.alt.net> |
On 06/03/2016 12:35, Ted&Alice Street wrote: > Alex W. wrote: > >> On 05/03/2016 15:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote: >>> Alex W. wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/03/2016 22:10, Ted&Alice Street wrote: >>>>> Alex W. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 04/03/2016 18:28, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:57:51 PM UTC, Alex W. wrote: >>>>>>>> On 04/03/2016 02:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote: >>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 8:40 PM, Bob Officer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 2:14 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/03/2016 13:47, Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 8:02 AM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/03/2016 19:20, Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/2/2016 3:09 AM, Wisely Non-Theist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <nb5fs7$qk6$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one with a lot of theological >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contortions, twisting >>>>>>>>>> and >>>> distorting what has been accepted by millions of >> people >>>>for >>>>the last two >>>> thousand years, and exaggerating >> with >>>>>>>>anthropomorphisms the sovereignty >>>> of God, you lack >>>>>> understanding >>>>>>>>>> of the word "omnipotent". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Argumentum ad populum. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because lots of people believe in something >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not make it >>>>>>>>>> true, >>> nor does it confer credibility or legitimacy on the >>>>>> belief >>>>>>>>>> itself. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, you're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not believe God exists, nor that the Bible >>>>>>>>>>>> is the Word of God simply because most people are >>>>>>>>>>>> inclined to believe it, so the >>>>>>>>>> Appeal to >> Popularity fallacy does not hold up in this case. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So are you lying now, or were you lying when you >>>>>>>>>>> posted: "The only claims I have made are that I >>>>>>>>>>> believe God exists, and I believe the Bible is the >>>>>>>>>>> Word of God." In your reply with ID Message-Id: >>>>>>>>>>> <nba576$s06$1@dont-email.me> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is English your second language? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? Is he one of those illiterates who don't >>>>>>>>> know the difference between "tenets" and "tenants"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is English your second language, Robert? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Silly cheap shot, that, and not one which in any way >>>>>>>> enhances either his credibility or his argument. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, Alex. Ya gotta remember I'm just an idiot, okay? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Welcome to the club. >>>>>> >>>>>> :-) >>>>> >>>>> You're unquestionably brilliant. The only idiot here is me. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Methinks he doth protest too much... >>>> >>>> Idiots do not make for good trolls, for a start... >>>> :-) >>> >>> Methinks you're too kind because I'm not a good troll, not by a long >>> shot! But I don't aspire to be one. Just an ordinary run-o'-the-mill >>> variety. >> >> Oh, I think you are a step or three above that. No drive-by >> flamings, no instantly outrageous posts... >> >> >>> >>> Creative trolls seem to appear only occasionally. One that comes to >>> mind is Max Varaszlo, who used to troll alt.politics.homosexuality >>> roughly ten years ago. Have you heard of him? >>> >> >> I'm afraid I have not had the pleasure of his online acquaintance. > > I googled him must now (Varazslo, not Varaszlo -- I blame my Polish > study) and found he was active as one of the atheists in alt.atheism > during the 90's. > Polish study? Impressive. That language always seemed to suffer from a severe shortage of vowels to me. My own studies in that regard never went any further than ordering golabki and vodka...
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-05 13:55 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-05 15:27 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 09:52 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 13:57 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:55 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 18:20 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 09:57 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice" <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:23 -0800
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:31 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-08 23:46 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-09 22:38 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 19:02 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 19:22 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:11 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 12:03 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:32 +0000
csiph-web