Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2070773
| From | "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love |
| Date | 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000 |
| Organization | Ted&Alice Street |
| Message-ID | <97dto6.ii.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <dju4krFenolU2@mid.individual.net> <979mlm.de1.17.2@news.alt.net> <dk06qvF31nU3@mid.individual.net> <97bjdl.ise.19.1@news.alt.net> <dk2cugFh1lbU1@mid.individual.net> |
Alex W. wrote: > On 05/03/2016 15:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote: > > Alex W. wrote: > > > > > On 04/03/2016 22:10, Ted&Alice Street wrote: > > > > Alex W. wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 04/03/2016 18:28, Ted&Alice wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:57:51 PM UTC, Alex W. wrote: > > > > > > > On 04/03/2016 02:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote: > > > > > > > > Robert Duncan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 8:40 PM, Bob Officer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 2:14 PM, Alex W. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/03/2016 13:47, Robert Duncan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 8:02 AM, Alex W. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 02/03/2016 19:20, Robert Duncan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/2/2016 3:09 AM, Wisely Non-Theist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <nb5fs7$qk6$2@dont-email.me>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > <Snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're the one with a lot of theological > > > > > > > > > > > > > contortions, twisting > >>>>>>>>and >>>> distorting what has been accepted by millions of > people >>>>for >>>>the last two >>>> thousand years, and exaggerating > with >>>>>>>>anthropomorphisms the sovereignty >>>> of God, you lack > > > > > understanding > > > > > > > > > of the word "omnipotent". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Argumentum ad populum. > > > > > > > > > > > > Just because lots of people believe in something > > > > > > > > > > > > does not make it > >>>>>>>>true, >>> nor does it confer credibility or legitimacy on the > > > > > belief > > > > > > > > > itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, you're wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not believe God exists, nor that the Bible > > > > > > > > > > > is the Word of God simply because most people are > > > > > > > > > > > inclined to believe it, so the > >>>>>>>>Appeal to >> Popularity fallacy does not hold up in this case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So are you lying now, or were you lying when you > > > > > > > > > > posted: "The only claims I have made are that I > > > > > > > > > > believe God exists, and I believe the Bible is the > > > > > > > > > > Word of God." In your reply with ID Message-Id: > > > > > > > > > > <nba576$s06$1@dont-email.me> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is English your second language? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you ask? Is he one of those illiterates who don't > > > > > > > > know the difference between "tenets" and "tenants"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is English your second language, Robert? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Silly cheap shot, that, and not one which in any way > > > > > > > enhances either his credibility or his argument. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, Alex. Ya gotta remember I'm just an idiot, okay? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Welcome to the club. > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > You're unquestionably brilliant. The only idiot here is me. :) > > > > > > > > > > Methinks he doth protest too much... > > > > > > Idiots do not make for good trolls, for a start... > > > :-) > > > > Methinks you're too kind because I'm not a good troll, not by a long > > shot! But I don't aspire to be one. Just an ordinary run-o'-the-mill > > variety. > > Oh, I think you are a step or three above that. No drive-by > flamings, no instantly outrageous posts... > > > > > > Creative trolls seem to appear only occasionally. One that comes to > > mind is Max Varaszlo, who used to troll alt.politics.homosexuality > > roughly ten years ago. Have you heard of him? > > > > I'm afraid I have not had the pleasure of his online acquaintance. I googled him must now (Varazslo, not Varaszlo -- I blame my Polish study) and found he was active as one of the atheists in alt.atheism during the 90's.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-05 13:55 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-05 15:27 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 09:52 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 13:57 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:55 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 18:20 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 09:57 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice" <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:23 -0800
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:31 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-08 23:46 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-09 22:38 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 19:02 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 19:22 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:11 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 12:03 +0000
Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:32 +0000
csiph-web