Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #2070773

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

From "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c>
Newsgroups alt.atheism
Subject Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love
Date 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000
Organization Ted&Alice Street
Message-ID <97dto6.ii.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References (23 earlier) <dju4krFenolU2@mid.individual.net> <979mlm.de1.17.2@news.alt.net> <dk06qvF31nU3@mid.individual.net> <97bjdl.ise.19.1@news.alt.net> <dk2cugFh1lbU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Alex W. wrote:

> On 05/03/2016 15:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> > Alex W. wrote:
> > 
> > > On 04/03/2016 22:10, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> > > > Alex W. wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On 04/03/2016 18:28, Ted&Alice wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:57:51 PM UTC, Alex W. wrote:
> > > > > > > On 04/03/2016 02:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> > > > > > > > Robert Duncan wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 8:40 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 2:14 PM, Alex W. wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/03/2016 13:47, Robert Duncan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/2016 8:02 AM, Alex W. wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 02/03/2016 19:20, Robert Duncan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/2/2016 3:09 AM, Wisely Non-Theist
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <nb5fs7$qk6$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > <Snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You're the one with a lot of theological
> > > > > > > > > > > > > contortions, twisting
> >>>>>>>>and >>>> distorting what has been accepted by millions of
> people >>>>for >>>>the last two >>>> thousand years, and exaggerating
> with >>>>>>>>anthropomorphisms the sovereignty >>>> of God, you lack
> > > > > understanding
> > > > > > > > > of the word "omnipotent".
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Argumentum ad populum.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just because lots of people believe in something
> > > > > > > > > > > > does not make it
> >>>>>>>>true, >>> nor does it confer credibility or legitimacy on the
> > > > > belief
> > > > > > > > > itself.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > No, you're wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > I do not believe God exists, nor that the Bible
> > > > > > > > > > > is the Word of God simply because most people are
> > > > > > > > > > > inclined to believe it, so the
> >>>>>>>>Appeal to >> Popularity fallacy does not hold up in this case.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > So are you lying now, or were you lying when you
> > > > > > > > > > posted:  "The only claims I have made are that I
> > > > > > > > > > believe God exists, and I believe the Bible is the
> > > > > > > > > > Word of God." In your reply with ID Message-Id:
> > > > > > > > > > <nba576$s06$1@dont-email.me>
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Is English your second language?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Why do you ask? Is he one of those illiterates who don't
> > > > > > > > know the difference between "tenets" and "tenants"?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Is English your second language, Robert?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Silly cheap shot, that, and not one which in any way
> > > > > > > enhances either his credibility or his argument.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sorry, Alex. Ya gotta remember I'm just an idiot, okay? :)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Welcome to the club.
> > > > > 
> > > > > :-)
> > > > 
> > > > You're unquestionably brilliant. The only idiot here is me. :)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Methinks he doth protest too much...
> > > 
> > > Idiots do not make for good trolls, for a start...
> > > :-)
> > 
> > Methinks you're too kind because I'm not a good troll, not by a long
> > shot! But I don't aspire to be one. Just an ordinary run-o'-the-mill
> > variety.
> 
> Oh, I think you are a step or three above that.  No drive-by
> flamings, no instantly outrageous posts...
> 
> 
> > 
> > Creative trolls seem to appear only occasionally. One that comes to
> > mind is Max Varaszlo, who used to troll alt.politics.homosexuality
> > roughly ten years ago. Have you heard of him?
> > 
> 
> I'm afraid I have not had the pleasure of his online acquaintance.

I googled him must now (Varazslo, not Varaszlo -- I blame my Polish
study) and found he was active as one of the atheists in alt.atheism
during the 90's.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-05 13:55 +0000
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-05 15:27 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 09:52 +0000
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 13:57 +0000
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:55 +0000
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 18:20 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 09:57 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice" <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:23 -0800
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:31 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-08 23:46 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-09 22:38 +0000
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 19:02 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 19:22 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:11 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 12:03 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:32 +0000

csiph-web