Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #2070784

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

From "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups alt.atheism
Subject Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love
Date 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000
Message-ID <dk2o3dFjtdlU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (23 earlier) <979mlm.de1.17.2@news.alt.net> <dk06qvF31nU3@mid.individual.net> <97bjdl.ise.19.1@news.alt.net> <dk2cugFh1lbU1@mid.individual.net> <97dto6.ii.19.1@news.alt.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/03/2016 12:35, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> Alex W. wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2016 15:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
>>> Alex W. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/03/2016 22:10, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
>>>>> Alex W. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/03/2016 18:28, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:57:51 PM UTC, Alex W. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 04/03/2016 02:27, Ted&Alice Street wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 8:40 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 2:14 PM, Alex W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/03/2016 13:47, Robert Duncan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2016 8:02 AM, Alex W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/03/2016 19:20, Robert Duncan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/2/2016 3:09 AM, Wisely Non-Theist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <nb5fs7$qk6$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one with a lot of theological
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contortions, twisting
>>>>>>>>>> and >>>> distorting what has been accepted by millions of
>> people >>>>for >>>>the last two >>>> thousand years, and exaggerating
>> with >>>>>>>>anthropomorphisms the sovereignty >>>> of God, you lack
>>>>>> understanding
>>>>>>>>>> of the word "omnipotent".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Argumentum ad populum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because lots of people believe in something
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not make it
>>>>>>>>>> true, >>> nor does it confer credibility or legitimacy on the
>>>>>> belief
>>>>>>>>>> itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you're wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not believe God exists, nor that the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>>> is the Word of God simply because most people are
>>>>>>>>>>>> inclined to believe it, so the
>>>>>>>>>> Appeal to >> Popularity fallacy does not hold up in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So are you lying now, or were you lying when you
>>>>>>>>>>> posted:  "The only claims I have made are that I
>>>>>>>>>>> believe God exists, and I believe the Bible is the
>>>>>>>>>>> Word of God." In your reply with ID Message-Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> <nba576$s06$1@dont-email.me>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is English your second language?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? Is he one of those illiterates who don't
>>>>>>>>> know the difference between "tenets" and "tenants"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is English your second language, Robert?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Silly cheap shot, that, and not one which in any way
>>>>>>>> enhances either his credibility or his argument.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, Alex. Ya gotta remember I'm just an idiot, okay? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welcome to the club.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> You're unquestionably brilliant. The only idiot here is me. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Methinks he doth protest too much...
>>>>
>>>> Idiots do not make for good trolls, for a start...
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Methinks you're too kind because I'm not a good troll, not by a long
>>> shot! But I don't aspire to be one. Just an ordinary run-o'-the-mill
>>> variety.
>>
>> Oh, I think you are a step or three above that.  No drive-by
>> flamings, no instantly outrageous posts...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Creative trolls seem to appear only occasionally. One that comes to
>>> mind is Max Varaszlo, who used to troll alt.politics.homosexuality
>>> roughly ten years ago. Have you heard of him?
>>>
>>
>> I'm afraid I have not had the pleasure of his online acquaintance.
>
> I googled him must now (Varazslo, not Varaszlo -- I blame my Polish
> study) and found he was active as one of the atheists in alt.atheism
> during the 90's.
>

Polish study?  Impressive.  That language always seemed to suffer from a 
severe shortage of vowels to me.  My own studies in that regard never 
went any further than ordering golabki and vodka...

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-05 13:55 +0000
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-05 15:27 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 09:52 +0000
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 12:35 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 13:02 +0000
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 13:57 +0000
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:55 +0000
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-06 18:20 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 09:57 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice" <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:23 -0800
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:31 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-08 23:46 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-03-09 22:38 +0000
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 19:02 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 19:22 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:11 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 12:03 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:32 +0000

csiph-web