Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.conspiracy > #269722

Re: a short history of "False flags"

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy
Subject Re: a short history of "False flags"
Date 2015-10-17 06:50 +0200
Message-ID <d8e2cfF3ifgU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <MPG.30843d545825246698c341@news.giganews.com> <d80pd8FlvgbU1@mid.individual.net> <teum1b5mvv00p9gb2rpa0978uhajvabrlm@4ax.com> <d8beq1FcslkU1@mid.individual.net> <lce12btfr10ph785b2pf030hsfq9m63ah8@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 16.10.2015 10:47, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:03:56 +0200, Thomas Heger<ttt_heg@web.de>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> My approach is different:
>>>> after having studied 9/11 for many years now, I try to apply my
>>>> 'knowledge' to other events.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        You have very little knowledge. That's not intended as an insult.
>>>
>>>> Or: if 9-11 was a big false-flag operation, then what else was?
>>>>
>>>
>>>        There is no actual evidence that it was a false flag.
>>
>>
>> This is actually true, since there have been no flags at all waving on 9/11.
>>
>
>       Physical flags do not factor into this.
>
>> So we still wonder, whether or not there have been planes involved.
>
>       100% of the available evidence proves there were.
>
>> Also
>> the mechanism of destruction is still disputed and a lot of other details.
>
>       No, it's not. Only the mentally ill question it.


I personally assume, that Judy Wood is right and space-base 'scalar wave 
lasers' have been used, that operate similar to what John Hutchison has 
invented.

So I have a certain opinion and this is apparently, what is now the most 
'successful' hypothesis  among what you would call 'troofers'.

>>
>> What we actually have not seen is someone convincingly saying: we did it.
>>
>
>       Osama Bin Laden did.
>
>> There were videos of an apparently arabic person, pretending to be Osama
>> bin Laden, who said, they were not responsible.
>
>       At first OBL expressed his natural cowardly nature by denying any
> involvement. He later admitted to it.
>


Someone said something in some video.

But the first someone, pretending to be Osama bin Laden, said, they were 
not involved in this event.

Then another bin Laden came and said, they were responsible.

But the real Osama bin Laden (allegedly) died before 9/11 2001 of cancer 
in an US hospital.

So: who then have been the people, that pretended to be Osama bin Laden?

Astonishingly there exist a proposal for that question, too:

"Is Obama really Osama Bin Laden? "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dM08DIEdNU

(There are several other videos, pretending to provide proof of this 
hypothesis,too - even more astonishingly).

>> So: no false flag (since there were no flags at all).
>
>       Again, physical flags do not factor into this.
>

No, wrong, since 'false flag' means: an operation, where soldiers/agents 
do something in the guise of others (countries, groups, people) and 
blame that on these people, groups or countries.

This is creation of an event under 'false flag'. This would require some 
kind of guise or material objects, that are symbols or typical 
behaviours of the group, you try to blame for what they have not done.

So some kind of events is necessary, where symbols like flags of other 
countries are used. Other possibilities are wrong uniforms, masks, wrong 
names or false ethnicity.

Very simple (stupid) example: if your paint you face black and then 
pretend to be a negro.

Or: English soldiers wearing German (Nazi) uniforms and doing something 
nasty in that guise (at later blame Germany for that).

But something physical is necessary, if you want to talk about 'false 
flag operation'.


TH

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

a short history of "False flags" Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-09 11:05 -0700
  Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-10 07:08 +0200
    Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-11 00:27 +0200
      Re: a short history of "False flags" BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-11 10:33 -0400
        Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-12 05:57 +0200
          Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 04:14 -0500
            Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-16 07:03 +0200
              Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:47 -0500
                Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-17 06:50 +0200
                Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 04:00 -0500
                Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-18 07:04 +0200
          Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-13 04:57 +0200
          Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-13 05:33 +0200

csiph-web