Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #269567
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy |
| Subject | Re: a short history of "False flags" |
| Date | 2015-10-12 05:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d80pd8FlvgbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <georgewk10-249331.11050509102015@news.toast.net> <d7rkr7Fce9nU1@mid.individual.net> <d7thm7Frer9U2@mid.individual.net> <MPG.30843d545825246698c341@news.giganews.com> |
Am 11.10.2015 16:33, schrieb BDK: > In article<d7thm7Frer9U2@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says... >> >> Am 10.10.2015 07:08, schrieb Thomas Heger: >>> Am 09.10.2015 20:05, schrieb Shoe-Chucker 2: >>>> False flag (or black flag) describes covert operations designed to >>>> deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are >>>> being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who >>>> actually planned and executed them. Operations carried out during >>>> peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government >>>> agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek >>>> to hide the real organization behind an operation. Geraint Hughes uses >>>> the term to refer to those acts carried out by "military or security >>>> force personnel, which are then blamed on terrorists."[1] >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag >>> >>> some random proposals: >>> >>> >>> Sandy Hook >>> >>> Columbine High >>> >>> Oklahoma city >>> >>> 7/7 >>> >>> 9/11 >>> >>> Baader-Meinhoff >>> >>> Pearl Harbour >>> >>> Golf of Tonkin >>> >>> Gleiwitz Radio Station >>> >>> Sarajewo murders >>> >>> Lusitania >>> >>> Titanic >>> >>> Achille Lauro >>> >>> Entebbe >>> >>> Gunpowder plot >>> >>> Boston tea party >>> >>> Laurence of Arabia >>> >>> .. >> >> a few more: >> >> >> Francis Drake >> >> Boston bombings >> >> Troyan horse >> >> >> >> TH > > More accurately, a list of stuff you have really weird ideas about. > Well, actually not. My approach is different: after having studied 9/11 for many years now, I try to apply my 'knowledge' to other events. Or: if 9-11 was a big false-flag operation, then what else was? First: Francis Drake used the tactic called 'false flag' to sneak at enemy ships and later sink them. Also the Troyan horse was somehow a 'false flag operation' (by Ithakas special forces). Laurence of Arabia was famous for pretending to be an Arab and doing havoc in this guise to the Ottoman Empire. But how about Baader and Meinhoff? Those were German terrorists in the 70th. In my opinion the story 'smells'. I mean: it doesn't really add up to a convincing story. Would 'false flag' actually do? Difficult question, but 'false flag' (or agents guised as terrorist) is a possibility. And one should think about the plot from the side of the agencies: what could be the benefit (for those agencies)? This is the question: why 'false flag' operations in the first place? Apparently we have different approaches to support similar goals: the totalitarian utopia of Fabian socialist, called 'New World Order'. To achieve this, certain civil rights had to be revoked, democracies weakened and opposing forces eliminated. These opponents are the nations, the religions and the middle-class (aka 'capitalists'). And Baader/Meinhoff did real damage to the German society, since they allowed certain restrictions of liberties, (very much like the aftermath of 9-11). Or how about the 'Gunpowder plot'. Another unconvincing story. Actually more likely the plot was planned from 'inside' (certain parts of the administration), rather than by a single 'terrorist'. From this I have drawn the conclusion, it's a rather bad idea to wear such Guy Fawkes masks within the movement called 'Anonymous'. Actually the plot was to blow up the parliament, hence it was definitely against democracy. Or even this movement 'Anonymous' could be a part from such a 'bad guys network', since they guise themselves as terrorists. TH
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a short history of "False flags" Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-09 11:05 -0700
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-10 07:08 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-11 00:27 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-11 10:33 -0400
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-12 05:57 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 04:14 -0500
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-16 07:03 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:47 -0500
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-17 06:50 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 04:00 -0500
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-18 07:04 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-13 04:57 +0200
Re: a short history of "False flags" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-10-13 05:33 +0200
csiph-web