Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #76446

Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy?

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy?
Date 2015-07-31 07:28 +1000
Message-ID <d1vj86F7l8tU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <mp4p5h$img$1@news.sap-ag.de> <d1ngo2F5ut9U1@mid.individual.net> <mp7bhb$f9g$1@news.sap-ag.de> <d1ucspFs9nfU1@mid.individual.net> <mpdfkh$5cq$1@news.sap-ag.de>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote
>>>>> Kees Nuyt wrote
>>>>>> Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote

>>>>>>> It is true in the sense that many providers here in Germany
>>>>>>> actually have a paragraph stating that VOIP is not supported.

>>>>>> "Not supported" does not mean "forbidden".

>>>>> Nope, they mean it in the sense of 'forbidden'.

>>>> BULLSHIT. Skype works fine.

>>> Did I say anything different?

>> Everyone can see that you did, fuckwit.

>>> *You* don't understand the difference between something being being 
>>> forbidden by the terms of the service

>> Skype isn't.

> And you know the German terms of service from our mobile providers where 
> from?

I got real radical and used the net, fuckwit.

>>> (which is only a legal matter),

>> Wrong, as always.

> You don't have a clue, as always.

Terms of service ain't a legal matter, fuckwit.

>>> and blocking something so that a customer can't use it

>> Skype ain't either.

> I never said Skype is blocked.

I never said you did.

>>> (which is a technical matter).

>> Wrong, as always.

> Blocking Skype is no technical matter?

You just said that skype ain't blocked, fuckwit.

>>> As I already stated days ago, a number of German providers have (had?)
>>> terms that forbid the usage of VoIP connections on their mobile networks

>> BULLSHIT.

> As if you had any clue about the situation here in Germany.

You're free to cite kraut providers doing that.

>>> - but I have to see a provider actually enforcing this regulation by 
>>> blocking such services (like Skype).

>> Because they aren't allowed to forbid VOIP, fuckwit.

> Show me the German(!) law forbidding them such a term.

Go and fuck yourself, again.

>>>>>> They just want to warn you that their helpdesk will not help you 
>>>>>> solve any problems with VOIP. You are on your own - but of course 
>>>>>> there are webfora and possibly newsgroups with enthousiasts that will 
>>>>>> try to help people with VOIP setup questions.

>>>>> That is yet another point, but not the one they want to address with
>>>>> that paragraph.

>>>> Wrong on that last. VOIP is not forbidden. Skype works fine.

> Two different things,

Wrong, as always.

<reams of your desperate attempt to bullshit your
way out of your predicament that any 2 year old
could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>

>>> Read up about the difference between 'forbidden' and 'blocked'.

>> Don’t need to.

<reams of your desperate attempt to bullshit your
way out of your predicament that any 2 year old
could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>

>>>>>>> However, as of now I have not really heard that they actually
>>>>>>> enforce this - which in turn shows that this is not really
>>>>>>> used all that much as of now. Might change, though...

>>>>>> Low-cost VOIP is quite common in Europe for the tech savvy crowd.

>>>>> Which is still a (comparably small) subset of the overall crowd... ;-)

>>>> Bullshit with Skype alone.

>>> You've got no idea about the usage of Skype in Germany.

>> Wrong, as always.

> Here we go again...

Just how many of you are there between those ears, kraut ?

>>> And I'm not talking about the number of customers, but the number of 
>>> minutes actually used - just to be precise.

>> You don’t either, no one does.

<reams of your desperate attempt to bullshit your
way out of your predicament that any 2 year old
could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>

>>>>>> The average consumer will only use VOIP if their ISP includes and
>>>>>> supports it in the package - usually triple play: Internet / Phone /
>>>>>> TV, either over phone or cable-TV infrastructure. They don't know
>>>>>> it's VOIP though ;)
>>
>>>>> Here in Germany all landline providers (mostly it's the former
>>>>> monopolist T-Com, but as well cable companies, Vodafone, and a few
>>>>> local ones) either always sold VoIP telephone lines, or currently in
>>>>> the process of converting all their landlines to VoIP (to be
>>>>> concluded by 2018).
>>
>>>> Separate matter entirely to what is being discussed.
>>
>>> As if you cared...
>>
>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>
> Here we go again.

Record's stuck, kraut.

>>>>> However, this is done in a way that the usual consumer won't see much
>>>>> of a difference (except for perhaps slightly worse service grades).

>>>> It can be significantly better.

>>> Yepp, it can be. Unfortunately, as of now the service grade is not, it's 
>>> worse.

>> Wrong, as always.

> You're living literally on the other side of the earth, but claim to know 
> about the service quality here in Germany?

You krauts don’t fuck things like that, fuckwit.

>>> I'm on such a service and I (and many colleagues) see much more outages 
>>> than we ever had using POTS.

>> That isn't with the landlines converted to VOIP internally.

> You obviously have not the slightest clue what I'm talking about.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

>>> And since we (most of us at least) are still using classical phones
>>> (and not IP phones), the advantages like better voice transmission
>>> (due to higher bandwidth) don't really show up.

>> Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

<reams of your desperate attempt to bullshit your
way out of your predicament that any 2 year old
could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>
 

Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:17 +0200
  Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> - 2015-07-22 08:36 -0400
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:15 -0400
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:33 -0400
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 16:43 +0200
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:53 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:02 +0200
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:37 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:36 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:34 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:43 +1000
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:30 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:57 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 15:58 -0400
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 18:54 -0400
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:44 -0400
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 16:39 +0200
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:39 -0400
          european contracts (was: Who pays for a phone..) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 09:01 +0000
            Re: european contracts JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-08-05 12:26 -0400
            Re: european contracts (was: Who pays for a phone..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:09 +1000
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:21 -0400
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 16:37 +0200
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> - 2015-07-22 12:01 -0400
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:43 -0400
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:57 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 16:06 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 18:54 -0400
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 14:40 -0400
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 12:24 -0700
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 17:06 -0400
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:57 +0200
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:45 -0400
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:45 -0400
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 10:01 +0200
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Zaidy036 <Zaidy036@isp.spam> - 2015-07-22 15:25 -0400
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> - 2015-07-23 14:22 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:14 -0700
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> - 2015-07-24 08:07 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:02 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:38 +0200
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-24 18:20 +0000
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:10 -0400
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:21 +0000
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:02 +1000
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 10:06 +0200
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:06 -0400
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 10:23 +0200
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:09 -0400
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 10:12 +0200
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:38 +0200
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:33 +1000
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-30 17:25 +0200
                Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:28 +1000
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 15:50 -0400
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:18 +0000
            Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:00 -0400
              Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 11:13 +0200
          Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 10:30 +0200
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:47 -0400
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 18:13 -0400
  Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:18 -0400
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:33 -0400
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 16:49 +0200
  Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:40 +1000
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-23 17:29 +0000
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-24 18:11 +0000
    Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:47 +0200
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:47 +0200
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:43 +1000
      Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2015-07-28 12:21 +0100
        Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:44 +1000

csiph-web