Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #273129

Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming

From Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References <IvSdnbywPI3tJUnInZ2dnUU7-REAAAAA@giganews.com> <mr2fnr$u94$1@speranza.aioe.org> <6423342cd2285a3db97fe4d18253b02d@dizum.com> <WedBx.50737$pM6.26272@fx15.iad>
Subject Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming
Message-ID <cbe87e5195e4dfb1ab9bea04ce39fb04@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-08-20 17:56 +0200
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

benj, in <news:WedBx.50737$pM6.26272@fx15.iad> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> On 08/20/2015 12:17 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> gilber34, in <news:mr2fnr$u94$1@speranza.aioe.org> did thusly
>> jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On 8/19/2015 12:10 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:

>>>> New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and
>>>> could explain 'pause' in global warming

>> Out of the total 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle
>> each year, we produce only 29 gigatons. That is largely offset by
>> nature absorbing 18 gigatons more than it gives off. So we're
>> only adding 11 gigatons per year net. And nature will, naturally,
>> ramp up to absorb that, as it has done throughout earth's
>> history... if it hadn't, CO2 levels would have reached "runaway"
>> levels long before we ever came on the scene.

>>> so 97% of Climate Scientist Admit they used Flawed Computer Programs to
>>> generate Global Worming

>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>
>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>> University of Queensland.

> STOP RIGHT THERE!
> 
> John Cook a "professor"? That's a good one! He's a "fellow" at 
> awarmballer propaganda foundation and doesn't even pretend to know 
> science. He's a failed cartoonist which is what you'd expect for this 
> kind of work. (Ever see HVAC produce any proof of any degree or science 
> knowledge?)
> 
> http://web.archive.org/web/20060820035503/http://cartoons.sev.com.au/Sev-Space/Fraud-of-the-Rings
> 
> John Cook a "professor" That's about as good as saying Sam Wormley is a 
> "professor"! Both have identical credibility: none.

Ah, gotcha. So "Perfessur" Cook calling himself a professor is
yet another libtard lie. And we know he's a libtard because he
likes to dress up like a Nazi, if not in reality, at least in
Photoshop:
<http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html>

<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lbw90JPZq6Q/U3B9roVxLAI/AAAAAAAABJ4/swCjiaMzqFk/s1600/Herr+Cook.gif>

<http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8apmfouVO-Y/U3CCBVFmwPI/AAAAAAAABKU/Ci-CsSKCF0g/s1600/Herr+Dana.gif>

<http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/06/skeptcial-science-takes-creepy-to-a-whole-new-level/>

What's funny is this Perfessur Cook is so scared of how history
might view him that he's excluded that populartechnology.net web
page from archive.org... so we'll just quote that entire page
here.

<snicker>

=============================================================
=============================================================
=============================================================
=============================================================
The Truth about Skeptical Science

<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lbw90JPZq6Q/U3B9roVxLAI/AAAAAAAABJ4/swCjiaMzqFk/s1600/Herr+Cook.gif>
Source: Skeptical Science Forums

Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a
self-employed cartoonist, John Cook (who apparently pretends to
be a Nazi). It is moderated by zealots who ruthlessly censor any
and all form of dissent from their alarmist position. This way
they can pretend to win arguments, when in reality they have all
been refuted. The abuse and censorship does not pertain to simply
any dissenting commentator there but to highly credentialed and
respected climate scientists as well; Dr. Pielke Sr. has
unsuccessfully attempted to engage in discussions there only to
be childishly taunted and censored, while Dr. Michaels has been
dishonestly quoted and smeared. The irony of the site's
oxymoronic name "Skeptical Science" is that the site is not
skeptical of even the most extreme alarmist positions.

John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background
that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no
prior employment history in academia or climate science.

Thanks to the Wayback Machine we can reveal what his website
originally said,

"I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed
cartoonist" - John Cook, Skeptical Science

---------------
<http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YYVrr8BJIj4/U3CA_pKUGjI/AAAAAAAABKE/o8O69K9MHng/s1600/Cook+Cartoonist.gif>
<http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Y20HAVkDLGI/U3CBOi_mebI/AAAAAAAABKM/04qM-uzbrDs/s1600/Cook+SEV.gif>
---------------

It is very important for Mr. Cook to keep up this facade, as once
people learn of his lack of credentials and scientifically
worthless employment history they are unlikely to take his
website seriously no matter how he desperately pads his resume.
As opposed to the highly credentialed climate scientists his
staff harassed and censored;

Patrick J. Michaels, A.B. Biological Sciences, University of
Chicago (1971); S.M. Biology, University of Chicago (1975); Ph.D.
Ecological Climatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1979);
Research and Project Assistant, Center for Climatic Research,
University of Wisconsin (1976-1979); Assistant Professor of
Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1980-1986);
Virginia State Climatologist (1980-2007); President, Central
Virginia Chapter, American Meteorological Society (1986-1987);
Executive Board, American Association of State Climatologists
(1986-1989); Associate Professor of Environmental Sciences,
University of Virginia (1986-1995); President, American
Association of State Climatologists (1987-1988); Chair, Committee
on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society
(1988-1999); Senior Fellow in Environmental Studies, Cato
Institute (1992-Present); Visiting Scientist, Marshall Institute
(1996-Present); Member, American Association for the Advancement
of Science; Member, Association of American Geographers; Member,
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society; Professor of
Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1996-Present);
Contributor and Expert Reviewer, IPCC (1990, 1992, 1995, 2001,
2007)

Roger A. Pielke Sr., B.A. Mathematics, Towson State College
(1968); M.S. Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University (1969);
Ph.D. Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University (1973); Research
Assistant, Pennsylvania State University (1968); National Science
Foundation Trainee, Pennsylvania State University (1968-1971);
Research Meteorologist, Experimental Meteorology Laboratory, NOAA
(1971-1974); Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental
Sciences, University of Virginia (1974-1977); Distinguished
Authorship Award, NOAA (1974); Leroy Meisinger Award, American
Meteorological Society (1977); Associate Professor, Department of
Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1978-1981); Chief
Editor, Monthly Weather Review (1981-1985); Fellow, American
Meteorological Society (1982); Associate Professor of Atmospheric
Science, Colorado State University (1982-1985); Abell New Faculty
Research and Graduate Program Award (1984); Deputy Director,
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (1985-1988);
Professor of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University
(1985-2000), Abell Research Faculty Award (1987/1988); Researcher
of the Year, Colorado State University Research Foundation
(1993), Pennsylvania State Centennial Fellow (1996); Alumni of
the Year, Pennsylvania State College of Earth and Mineral
Sciences (1999); Colorado State Climatologist (1999-2006);
Engineering Dean's Council Award, Colorado State University
(2000); Adjunct Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Duke University (2003-2006); Fellow, American
Geophysical Union (2004); Visiting Professor, Department of
Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona (2004); Senior
Research Scientist, Cooperative Institute for Research in
Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado-Boulder
(2005-Present); Senior Research Associate, Department of
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado-Boulder
(2005-Present); Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science,
Colorado State University (2007-Present)

References:
Refuting 104 Talking Points from Skeptical Science (PDF) (28pgs)
(Lubos Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physics, March 29, 2010)
Skepticalscience – Rewriting History (Shub Niggurath Climate,
October 10, 2011)
Roger Pielke Sr at the SS.com: A dark day in the climate science
debate (Shub Niggurath Climate, September 18, 2011)
Skepticalscience.com quote surgery on Pat Michaels (Shub
Niggurath Climate, January 18, 2012)
My Interactions With Skeptical Science – A Failed Attempt (So
Far) For Constructive Dialog (Roger A. Pielke Sr., September 17,
2011)
Final Comments On My Interaction With Skeptical Science (Roger A.
Pielke Sr., September 21, 2011)
Response To Skeptical Science On A Series Of Weblog Posts (Roger
A. Pielke Sr., October 25, 2011)
A Response to Skeptical Science's "Patrick Michaels: Serial
Deleter of Inconvenient Data" (Patrick J. Michaels, January 17,
2012)


Update 1: In March of 2012, the climate alarmist website
Skeptical Science had their forums "hacked" and the contents
posted online. What was revealed is simply astonishing,

Skeptical Science: The Censorship of Poptech
"The impact of that ban on PopTech was to silence him." -
[Skeptical Science]
Skeptical Science: "Ding dong, the witch is dead"
"Conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart is dead at 43" "Ding
dong, the witch is dead..." - John Hartz [Skeptical Science],
March 2, 2012
Skeptical Science: "[W]e're all a bunch of leftists"
"It's official, we're all a bunch of leftists" - John Cook
[Skeptical Science], August 26, 2011
Skeptical Science: The Partnership with Al Gore
"This morning, had a long skype call with a guy working with Al
Gore's Climate Reality Project. [...] He brought up the
possibility of a partnership. [...] an exciting opportunity and
another vindication of what we're doing" - John Cook [Skeptical
Science], September 27, 2011
Skeptical Science: From Al Gore to Al Jazeera
"Al Jazeera want[s] to feature SkS as the Site of the Week... Am
sending them some info and pics now." - John Cook [Skeptical
Science], September 28, 2011
Skeptical Science: Too Inaccurate for Joe Romm
"Just got this email from Joe Romm: You must do more post
vetting. More errors are creeping into posts and it will start
making people like me wary of using them." - John Cook [Skeptical
Science], December 2, 2011
Skeptical Science: "Drown Them Out" 
"Badgersouth [John Hartz] and I were just discussing the
potential of setting up a coordinated "Crusher Crew" where we
could pull our collective time and knowledge together in order to
pounce on overly vocal deniers on various comments sections of
blogs and news articles." - Rob Honeycutt [Skeptical Science],
February 11, 2011


Update 2: On August 6, 2013, a hidden image folder was found on
the Skeptical Science forums that contained uploaded images of
John Cook and Dana Nuccetelli photoshopped as Nazis.

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8apmfouVO-Y/U3CCBVFmwPI/AAAAAAAABKU/Ci-CsSKCF0g/s1600/Herr+Dana.gif
=============================================================
=============================================================
=============================================================
=============================================================

A "Crusher Crew" LOL
Their "Crusher Crew" ran away from me. LOL

Now, our resident Klimate Katastrophe Kook Kensi Kensington
should be around to perform damage control.

Thanks for the additional information that liberals are insane
because liberalism is a mental illness.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then
demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out
again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after
she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written
things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames
with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't
mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the
psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by
taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes
a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD"
that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no
proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into
admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living
a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay
community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the
CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that
liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated
that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a
nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity
to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to
prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so
badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when
they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that
land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per
Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when
it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA,
and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers
outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year
cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as
the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page
that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd
used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again
her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2
lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree
with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for
global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to
explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the
Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician,
1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed
were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist
or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state
that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of
liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from
socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky
contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and
biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual
scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself);
she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math;
she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he
admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that
every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming
majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the
liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology
experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis
skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me,
for 392 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of
her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's
kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading
comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able
to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was
receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the
length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more
evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not
attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe
husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly,
delusional ass anymore. LOL

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 06:17 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:05 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:08 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 17:56 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:04 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 18:13 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-21 00:15 -0400
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 19:23 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 12:03 -0400
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:57 +0200
              Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:09 -0400
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:14 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-22 16:32 -0500
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 01:26 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 04:01 -0400
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:48 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-22 01:40 -0700
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:16 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-23 12:55 -0700
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:59 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.astronomy.fart-acceptance> - 2015-08-21 08:31 +0000
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming МалыШ <oppressed.welly-boot.top@melancholy.yum.yum> - 2015-08-22 07:00 +0000
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alabama.clay.colored.stools> - 2015-08-22 22:31 +0000
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:17 +0200
              Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Akhen-f-eshef" <two.bit.altar.of.love@floppy.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-23 08:19 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 19:44 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Jackson Fashshaw-Pofway" <cracked.up.cooze@creaky.peach.fish> - 2015-08-23 23:22 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:12 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Cedric Fenningstone-Chistway" <dried-up.peeper@incomplete.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-24 03:03 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:47 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.christnet.party-girls> - 2015-08-25 04:00 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:21 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:23 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 18:41 -0400

csiph-web