Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #273164

Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:13:03 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x3nm91kntm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:17:47 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Solar and orbital forcing, the same causes of every other
>>> interglacial and glaciation period throughout earth's history,
>>> explain the 18 year 10 month pause in "global warming" quite
>>> nicely.
>>>
>>> Out of the total 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle
>>> each year, we produce only 29 gigatons. That is largely offset by
>>> nature absorbing 18 gigatons more than it gives off. So we're
>>> only adding 11 gigatons per year net. And nature will, naturally,
>>> ramp up to absorb that, as it has done throughout earth's
>>> history... if it hadn't, CO2 levels would have reached "runaway"
>>> levels long before we ever came on the scene.
>
>> and that's only been happening for about 50 years.  right?
>
> Solar output in the Ordovician was very nearly what it is today
> (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), yet CO2 concentrations in the
> Ordovician were at least 5 times higher than today. And yet the
> Ordovician slipped into an ice age that last ~1,000,000 years.
>
> If, as you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks k'lame, CO2 is a
> driver of temperature change, given that CO2 levels are at least
> 5 times lower today, why aren't we in a perpetual ice age?
>
> And if, as you k'lame, the earth is unable to cope with the tiny
> amount of extra CO2 humankind puts into the environment, just how
> did it cope through the Ordovician?
>
> Stop being such an environmental Chicken Little dumbshit and wake
> up to reality, you moron. Earth's never had it so good under our
> stewardship.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Anthropogenic CO2 contributes 1 ten millionth of one percent to
>>> temperature forcing, as has been proven mathematically. And given
>>> that the temperature forcing is negatively correlated with CO2
>>> concentration due to the efficient re-emission to space of
>>> infrared by CO2, as CO2 levels rise, temperature drops will
>>> become more severe on the night side of the planet, just as
>>> happens on Mars.
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDGgGttVvk4>
>
>>> No. Climate change whackadoodles lie. *And* they use flawed
>>> computer programs to generate alarmist global warming propaganda.
>>> Message-ID: <8f8bdad9840a40c99b0afe28d0a2055c@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
>>> humans are causing global warming
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #4
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
>>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
>>> =========================================================
>>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
>>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
>>> caused!".
>>>
>>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>>
>>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>>> University of Queensland.
>>>
>>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
>>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
>>> science articles.
>>>
>>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
>>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
>>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
>>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
>>> uncertain."
>>>
>>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
>>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
>>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
>>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
>>> position that humans are causing the warming."
>>>
>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>
>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>> =========================================================
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>> forcing
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #1
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> =================================================
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>
>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>
>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>
>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>
>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>> they otherwise would.
>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>> one iota.
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>> =================================================
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>> keep trying to sell.
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #5: The last decade 2000-2009 was
>>> the hottest on record.
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #5
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Another blatant lie.
>>> =========================================================
>>> Message-ID: <15ce479ee9f780168fcff750b5b112a8@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <08866ced31c10d3747efb9bf43b3d981@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <0b42119ce54a8e54585eabda09d60ae6@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <460825f8b0e76514eae0c7d9ffb79558@dizum.com>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> "Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the
>>> tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and
>>> discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We
>>> need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest.", writes Peter
>>> Thorne of the UK Met Office, "I also think the science is being
>>> manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes
>>> might not be too clever in the long run", Thorne adds.
>>>
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since
>>> ~1998. *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been
>>> dropping for ~17 years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied
>>> to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in
>>> recent years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack
>>> Machine archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic...
>>> *falling* temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>> ===============================================================
>
>>> "Global warming" or "anthropocentric climate change" or
>>> "anthropogenic climate disruption" or whatever the Klimate
>>> Katastrophe Kooks are calling it now in trying to sell bull shit
>>> as steak is nothing but a politicized scam... even the "climate
>>> scientists" flogging the "global warming" scam know it...
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
>>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
>>> public relations problem for us."
>>>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
>>> bag.
>>>
>>> The "climate scientists" know an ice age is coming... but their
>>> paymasters are telling them to flog global warming so those
>>> politicians can set up their carbon exchanges. The politicians
>>> will be ground floor investors in those carbon exchanges, which
>>> will increase the cost of living for everyone by hundreds of
>>> billions of dollars per year (remember Obama saying "electricity
>>> rates would necessarily skyrocket"? Yeah. Because the politicians
>>> would force the utilities to line the pockets of the politicians
>>> via the carbon exchange tax, and the utilities would pass that
>>> cost on to the consumers.)... all so those politicians can reap
>>> hundreds of millions of dollars per year in profits selling a
>>> solution that does nothing to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
>>> Anthropogenic global warming is a politicized scam, nothing more.
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b0d12057982df5cafade09fac73454fd@dizum.com>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> This is further borne out by the fact that the Antarctic ice
>>> sheet has been adding 49 Gt / year of land ice (and the sea ice
>>> is expanding faster than ever) since 2003, per Nasa's ICEsat,
>>> despite liberal whackadoodles k'laming it's losing ice at an
>>> unprecedented rate:
>>> Message-ID: <b5b82a4693774b84e8c96c06910bfb2e@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the length of the Arctic melting season
>>> declining for the past 5 years, according to sidads.colorado.edu:
>>> http://oi45.tinypic.com/27yr1wy.jpg
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that the "Annoying Lead Time
>>> Indicator" graph shows temperature trending downward:
>>> http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/annoying-lead-time-graph/#comment-44336
>>> "Both the Greenland and the Antarctica temperatures are lower
>>> than their peaks. They are generally trending downward overall.
>>> Antarctica in particular lead on the way up, and is lower than
>>> Greenland now. Furthermore, we know that right now ice is
>>> accumulating in Antarctica. Greenland is the tail on the
>>> Antarctic dog... And our W/m2 line is continuing in a decent
>>> downward slope. Harder to see in that Milankovitch Cycles
>>> composite graph. (Inspecting it, I was hoping we were already AT
>>> the bottom. We are not.) So we have a bit more drop in W/m2
>>> before we start back up, and we are below the energy level that
>>> pulls us out of a glacial, once one begins. All in all, this
>>> graph tells me that we are on the knife edge of a drop into a
>>> cold stage and acceleration into a glacial stage, from which we
>>> can not recover. (This is, in some ways, just a confirmation of
>>> the 416 W/m2 or so number from prior plunges – but on a graph
>>> showing that our drop in W/m2 is not yet done dropping.)"
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that Alaska has overall cooled by
>>> 2.4 F since 2000:
>>> http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/forget-global-warming-alaska-headed-ice-age
>>> You'll note that the "global temperatures surge hotter and the
>>> ice-cap crumbles" quote was due to scientists falsifying data.
>>> Observation of these phenomena proves that global temperatures
>>> are falling, and ice caps are adding ice.
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that we've had a 90 year *cooling*
>>> trend that the climate change scientists got caught trying to
>>> falsify data to make it appear as though it were a warming trend:
>>> Message-ID: <2c1ef34505cceac90d11237317727e33@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that there have been 129
>>> climate-related scandals to date, from outright falsification of
>>> data to unintentional data errors that were left intact because
>>> their removal would put truth to the climate change alarmist's
>>> lies:
>>> http://notrickszone.com/climate-scandals/
>>>
>>> Ironically, while a certain astronomical scientist demands
>>> peer-reviewed scientific literature (then ignores it when it is
>>> provided), the IPCC's errors stem primarily from reliance upon
>>> non-peer reviewed sources for their data, making it all too easy
>>> for climate change alarmists to use the IPCC as a platform for
>>> advancing their agenda. Of course, the IPCC has the same agenda,
>>> so those using it for that purpose are never called to account.
>>>
>>> And of course, the scientific research that absolutely blows out
>>> of the water the notion that CO2 is the cause of global warming
>>> is the *fact* that CO2 follows solar and orbital-forcing induced
>>> global warming by 600 to 1000 years, as even SkepticalScience.com
>>> admits.
>>> Message-ID: <2c1ef34505cceac90d11237317727e33@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> And of course, the climate change alarmists are loath to remind
>>> anyone that changes in temperature measurement methods was what
>>> introduced errors that led to the IPCC (and hence the US EPA)
>>> declaring anthropogenic global warming in the first place, but
>>> when the necessary corrective factors are applied to the data,
>>> their claim of anthropogenic temperature increases is severely
>>> reduced. That, combined with the observed increase in
>>> stratospheric water vapor content (remember, water vapor is a
>>> *much* larger contributor to greenhouse warming than CO2), wipes
>>> out even more of the IPCC's claim of AGW.:
>>> http://www.masterresource.org/2010/02/why-the-epa-is-wrong-about-recent-warming
>>>
>>> In fact, the man who started the 1970's "ice age" scare, and who
>>> was instrumental in advancing the current "global warming" scare,
>>> NASA scientist James Hansen, has said in 1999:
>>> http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/
>>> "Yet in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the
>>> past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases —
>>> in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the
>>> country."
>>>
>>> (You will note that it was none other than James Hansen who later
>>> lied and claimed 1998 to be the warmest year on record.)
>>>
>>> Well there you go... one of NASA's own scientists and currently
>>> one of the largest proponents of the AGW scaremongering,
>>> admitting that from 1940 onward to 1999, temperature actually
>>> went down... but he changed his tune after the global warming
>>> scare mongers changed the data so that the heat wave of the
>>> 1930's (remember 1934's record breaking heat wave and dust bowl,
>>> anyone?) appeared to be *less* than 1998 temperatures (remember
>>> 1998's dust bowl, anyone? No? Hmmm. That's because it was merely
>>> an El Nino year, and the Heat Index was much lower than that in
>>> 1934.), thereby making it appear as though anthropogenic global
>>> warming was taking place.
>>>
>>> http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/06/23/Global-warming-Fabricated-by-NASA-and-NOAA
>>>
>>> http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
>>>
>>> Of course, we now know the lack of a warming trend in the US was
>>> due to accurate measurement of temperature, said data being
>>> changed later, whereas other countries (notably Europe) were
>>> fudging the numbers long before US scientists... the US
>>> politicians finally caught onto the game around 2000, and
>>> colluded with the climate scientists to change the US data to
>>> start their own scare-mongering / profit scamming.
>>>
>>> So what we've got here is a bunch of scientists led by the nose
>>> because they wanted to continue receiving research grants,
>>> getting caught falsifying data so they could please those giving
>>> them those grants, all driven by corrupt liberal politicians who
>>> were attempting to commit the world's largest-ever con game on
>>> humanity. That falsified data was going to be used by certain
>>> politicians to set up "carbon exchanges" from which they would
>>> have reaped billions of dollars in profits. A secondary purpose
>>> of this politician-led global warming scam is as an instrument of
>>> authority to impose public policy that the politicians know
>>> they'd have no chance of otherwise imposing upon the populace.
>>>
>>> Had they believed their own hype, Al Gore wouldn't be living in a
>>> veritable mansion that's 4 times larger than surrounding homes
>>> and which used 12 times more energy than surrounding homes, and
>>> which was only able to lower its energy consumption by 11% after
>>> extensive renovation and "greening". According to Snopes, most
>>> homes used 20% to 30% more electricity during the 2009 summer
>>> than Gore's home... but only because Gore was almost never home,
>>> he was jetting around the world to give speeches, and pumping
>>> more greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere than the next 100
>>> people combined.
>>>
>>> So the truth has been revealed, and the con game is collapsing
>>> before their eyes.
>>>
>>> And for certain liberal whackadoodle astronomical scientists
>>> who've been 180 degrees out on every single thing they've
>>> k'lamed, it's just one more example of why liberalism is a mental
>>> disease that combines equal parts unquestioning gullibility,
>>> fawning deference to so-called "experts", dismissal of any
>>> evidence that refutes their kooky worldview, and disingenuous
>>> alteration of any evidence they think they can get away with
>>> altering to "prove" their point.
>>>
>>> At the rate scientists are going, it wouldn't surprise me if
>>> their credibility were soon less than that of Congresscritters.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
> DildoRider just hates all that truthiness and reality up above...
> it hurts his little LibTard brain. LOL
>

only an idiot would think that dumping chemicals into the atmosphere since  
the industrial revolution doesn't have any long-term effects.  thanks for  
stepping up and letting everybody know that you're an idiot.

ironic, given that you clearly appreciate science, you just seem to have  
enough of a stake in conservative whackjob politics to cherry-pick what  
you claim is the TRVTH.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 06:17 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:05 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:08 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 17:56 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:04 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 18:13 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-21 00:15 -0400
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 19:23 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 12:03 -0400
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:57 +0200
              Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:09 -0400
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:14 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-22 16:32 -0500
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 01:26 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 04:01 -0400
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:48 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-22 01:40 -0700
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:16 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-23 12:55 -0700
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:59 +0200
  Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.astronomy.fart-acceptance> - 2015-08-21 08:31 +0000
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
      Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming МалыШ <oppressed.welly-boot.top@melancholy.yum.yum> - 2015-08-22 07:00 +0000
        Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
          Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alabama.clay.colored.stools> - 2015-08-22 22:31 +0000
            Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:17 +0200
              Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Akhen-f-eshef" <two.bit.altar.of.love@floppy.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-23 08:19 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 19:44 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Jackson Fashshaw-Pofway" <cracked.up.cooze@creaky.peach.fish> - 2015-08-23 23:22 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:12 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Cedric Fenningstone-Chistway" <dried-up.peeper@incomplete.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-24 03:03 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:47 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.christnet.party-girls> - 2015-08-25 04:00 +0000
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:21 +0200
                Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:23 -0400
    Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 18:41 -0400

csiph-web