Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #122639

Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 2025-08-24 at 04:29 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 24.08.2025 um 03:52 schrieb wij:
> > On Sat, 2025-08-23 at 18:46 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > > Am 23.08.2025 um 17:30 schrieb wij:
> > > > On Sat, 2025-08-23 at 17:10 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > > > > Am 23.08.2025 um 16:41 schrieb Richard Heathfield:
> > > > > > On 23/08/2025 15:26, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > > > > > > Am 23.08.2025 um 16:16 schrieb olcott:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The actual case is that you are too f-cking
> > > > > > > > stupid to find any mistake in my work.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I wonder why one has to pursue such a question so paranoidly
> > > > > > > for years. I mean, it's nothing that has practical relevance.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I beg your pardon?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If he's right, the conventional proof of the undecidability of the
> > > > > > Halting Problem is flawed. You don't think that matters?
> > > > > 
> > > > > That has no practical relevance.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > *Of course* it matters... IF he's right.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > He /isn't/ right, but /he/ doesn't know that.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And I can't understand why others here are arguing so vehemently
> > > > > > > against it. It's obvious that Pete is crazy. It's best not to
> > > > > > > respond at all, then maybe it will calm down.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You start.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't argue against him in his sense.
> > > > 
> > > > If you cannot find the error of POOH, crazy or psychosis might be you.
> > > > Why not join the club to see what you though you understand? Maybe none.
> > > 
> > > Don't talk with him, he's an idiot.
> > 
> > That is because you don't know the required knowledge or think you know.
> 
> No, I don't talk to people with delusions.

You still don't get it. How do you know you are not deluded merely by yourself?

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

How is this answer not self-evident ? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 00:30 -0500
  Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 09:55 -0500
  Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Rice's Theorem is now Rice Krispies olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 15:30 -0500
  Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-14 06:40 +0000
    Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 10:18 +0200
    Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-14 09:06 -0400
      Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 09:17 -0500
        Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-08-14 18:54 +0200
          Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 09:35 +0200
            Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 09:16 -0500
              Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 16:26 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-08-23 15:41 +0100
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 17:10 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 23:30 +0800
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 18:46 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 09:52 +0800
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 04:29 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 10:41 +0800
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 12:09 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 22:29 +0800
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 23:30 +0800
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 10:32 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-23 17:46 +0000
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 12:52 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:21 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-08-24 09:35 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 10:25 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 15:33 +0000
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:23 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 16:41 +0000
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:56 -0500
                Re: Measuring the actual behavior of the actual input to HHH(DD) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-30 10:08 -0500
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 18:46 +0200
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 16:48 +0000
                Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:57 -0500
            Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Dr. Who <dr.who@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 15:15 +0000
  Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Kaz olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 07:01 -0500

csiph-web