Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #122627
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation |
| Date | 2025-08-23 11:21 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <108cppf$273cg$16@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <mg6in1Fjba1U1@mid.individual.net> <108bqu3$21hqv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <108cifq$273cg$1@dont-email.me> <108cj1b$2788v$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <108cjur$26upo$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 8/23/2025 9:41 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 23/08/2025 15:26, Bonita Montero wrote: >> Am 23.08.2025 um 16:16 schrieb olcott: >> >>> The actual case is that you are too f-cking >>> stupid to find any mistake in my work. >> >> I wonder why one has to pursue such a question so paranoidly >> for years. I mean, it's nothing that has practical relevance. > > I beg your pardon? > > If he's right, the conventional proof of the undecidability of the > Halting Problem is flawed. You don't think that matters? > > *Of course* it matters... IF he's right. > Thus providing evidence that Bonita Montero is a mere troll. > He /isn't/ right, but /he/ doesn't know that. > *This is a fact proven true on the basis of its meaning* When 0 to ∞ instructions of DD are correctly simulated by HHH this simulated DD never reaches its own simulated "return" statement final halt state. >> And I can't understand why others here are arguing so vehemently >> against it. It's obvious that Pete is crazy. It's best not to >> respond at all, then maybe it will calm down. > > You start. > I don't let people get away with denying facts that are proven true by the meaning of their words. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How is this answer not self-evident ? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 00:30 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 09:55 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Rice's Theorem is now Rice Krispies olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 15:30 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-14 06:40 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 10:18 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-14 09:06 -0400
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 09:17 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-08-14 18:54 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 09:35 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 09:16 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 16:26 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-08-23 15:41 +0100
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 17:10 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 23:30 +0800
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 18:46 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 09:52 +0800
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 04:29 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 10:41 +0800
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 12:09 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 22:29 +0800
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 23:30 +0800
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 10:32 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-23 17:46 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 12:52 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:21 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-08-24 09:35 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 10:25 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 15:33 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:23 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 16:41 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:56 -0500
Re: Measuring the actual behavior of the actual input to HHH(DD) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-30 10:08 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 18:46 +0200
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-08-23 16:48 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:57 -0500
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Recursive simulation Dr. Who <dr.who@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 15:15 +0000
Re: How is this answer not self-evident ? --- Kaz olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 07:01 -0500
csiph-web