Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287371

Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1%

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1%
Date 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
Organization ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID <bfhey9.r03a@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <mfgog7$34c$5@dont-email.me> <bvhd03.apf3@rooftop.invalid> <mfi4bt$l3u$3@dont-email.me> <hgue0.aa4pa@rooftop.invalid> <mficq8$80u$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 4/1/2015 10:49 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/1/2015 3:20 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/31/2015 5:52 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>>> (And a side note: Visits from devices running Linux account for a number
>>>>>>> equal to almost exactly 1 percent of all desktop traffic, although it
>>>>>>> appears that the government lumps Linux in with the mobile category for
>>>>>>> some reason.)
>>>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/which-operating-systems-and-browsers-are-most-popular-in-the-u-s/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Windows worldwide: **************************************************
>>>>>>>                      ****************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux worldwide:   *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heh!  Funny visual!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here, I plotted that for you
>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/65hvgOD.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Beautiful!
>>>>
>>>>> Must've come out of the (b)owl(s) of LibreOffice.  You have to work hard
>>>>> to make MS Office graphs look that bad.
>>>>
>>>> It was supposed to be gray-scale, but teh Mack wouldn't cooperate.
>>>> But R far surpasses anything DOZE OFFice can do :)
>>
>>> I can tell...
>>
>> Dood, how much effort do you expect me to put into a cola joke?
>> Linux, Doze, and Mack walk into a bar [five pages later... punch line]?

> Mack and Doze hookup with honeys.  Linux is punched out for wearing a 
> geeky GNU-head t-shirt.

I saw one online a while ago:  Three [whatevers] walk into a bar.
THe bartender says, "what is this, a joke?"

Another fave:  "A dyslexic walks into a bra..."

>>> If what you showed is any indication, it's another user-unfriendly,
>>> command-line GuhNoo dud.
>>
>>> Here's something to make it more fun:
>>> http://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio/download/
>>
>> I actually pasted the code from a different job.
>> The cols line for the chart I posted was actually:
>> cols<-c("gray50","gray60","pink","gray20")
>>
>>> Learn SAS and earn cash.  Learn R get job in bar.
>>
>> You don't know me very well if you think I would want to crunch numbers
>> for a living.

> I don't know you very well because you're tight-lipped about everything: 
> what you do for a living, where you live, what you drive, etc.  I know 
> you have an F1 race-car bed with gold and red stripes.

lol

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:48 -0400
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:54 -0700
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0100
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 04:54 -0700
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:52 +0100
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 05:06 -0700
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 21:52 +0000
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:32 -0400
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:47 -0700
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:54 -0400
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:27 -0700
              Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:13 -0400
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:45 -0400
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 19:20 +0000
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:25 -0400
              Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Debbie Ballard <debbie1ballard@gmail.com> - 2015-04-13 16:39 -0700
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 20:04 -0400

csiph-web