Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #163936
| From | Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? |
| Date | 2016-05-24 20:51 +0000 |
| Organization | Alberta Research Council |
| Message-ID | <XnsA61297CA614F2falkarcabca@213.239.209.88> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605232317380.19694@darkstar.example.org> <XnsA611E74FBCD8Bfalkarcabca@213.239.209.88> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241232390.20600@darkstar.example.org> <XnsA61279EB69B87falkarcabca@213.239.209.88> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241458510.20979@darkstar.example.org> |
Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241458510.20979@darkstar.example.org: > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Alfred Falk wrote: > >> Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in >> news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241232390.20600@darkstar.example.org: >> >>> On Tue, 24 May 2016, Alfred Falk wrote: >>> >>>> Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in >>>> news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1605232317380.19694@darkstar.example.org: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2016, Osmium wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Black" wrotee: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Years ago, a cousin of my mother who was interested in genealogy >>>>>>> did a family tree on my father's side, and that was it. Then >>>>>>> about 2009 I started doing searches, and it's amazing how much is >>>>>>> online. >>>>>>> Not just the family tree, but all kinds of history of it. I am >>>>>>> sort of torn, on one hand the family did have some role in >>>>>>> "history", but at the same time, they left a lot of paper around, >>>>>>> so it's easier for people to study them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I never thought of my grandmother as a social butterfly but I >>>>>> found an internet account of her hosting her card club in the >>>>>> 1930s. I looked for it recently and it had "gone missing" as >>>>>> people sometimes say. >>>>>> >>>>> I've been saving some of the stuff locally, precisely because I >>>>> don't trust that it will remain in place. Some cousin I'd never >>>>> heard of had the family tree up on his page, but that's >>>>> disappeared, I fear he's disappeared too. >>>>> >>>>> It is shakey. My great, great grandmother Henrietta is in the >>>>> Canadian Museum of History, at least their webpage, just a small >>>>> bit representing half breeds. Her picture is readily available >>>>> elsewhere, I have a book with her photo in it. (I assume it's the >>>>> only photo of her, it wasn't the time of snapshot cameras). But >>>>> museums change their displays, so I can imagine her getting bumped >>>>> at some point. There's no information at that site about her that >>>>> isn't elsewhere, but it's kind of neat that she's there (and I >>>>> assume because her photo and identity was already out there, not >>>>> because she's that important). >>>>> >>>>> I figured if I made the trip to the actual museum, I'd say "You >>>>> mean I don't get free entry? But that's my great, great >>>>> grandmother you have on display!". >>>>> >>>>> Some of her siblings got streets named after them in what became >>>>> Winnipeg. But her younger sister Jemima (yes Aunt Jemima), who had >>>>> self esteem issues (actually all the siblings suffered a bit from >>>>> that), her street was renamed, so there's no longer a Jemima >>>>> Street, just an Elgin Street. >>>> >>>> Elgin _Avenue_. Not far from the location of my earliest childhood >>>> memories. And even closer to my first home, of which I have no >>>> memories. A lot of the short streets near there have women's names: >>>> Lulu, Dorothy, Gwendoline, etc. I suppose the next avenue north is >>>> also named for your ancestors? >>>> >>> I haven't looked at a map, I just found some old historical society >>> article about where the street names came from. >>> >>> I assume the streets were named very early, rather than in >>> retrospect. So they are first names, just "plain people" who's father >>> had the clout to name the streets after them. James Street is for >>> Henrietta's brother, chief justice in the provisional government. >>> Not even a last name. >>> >>> I assume other families had say in the street naming, so those you >>> name are likely named after the daughters of other gentry. >>> >>> On the other hand, there is John Black Avenue, after Henrietta's >>> husband. That's less generic than James Street. I guess that's why >>> she doesn't get a street named after her. There's also John Black >>> United Church, they had their 100th anniversary last year or the year >>> before. >> >>> And then I found that Winnipeg can't sell the old police HQ, because >>> it was land sold to the early city of Winnipeg for a good price by >>> the cousins, on the condition it be used for the public good (I >>> forget the exact words). So if the city sells it, the money reverts >>> to the cousins. >> >> I think such caveats were fairly common. When Winnipeg built its new >> city hall in the 1960's they used land that was given or sold to city >> for the explicit purpose of being a farmers' market. That use was >> fading then, but there were legal battles. There have been similar >> situations in Edmonton where I live now. >> > That maybe was family land. I gather there are some other municipal > buildings that were on that land. > > But, some of the land was also used for a public market. What I read > was that it was used as a meeting place during the Great Winnipeg > Strike, and the way the piece read, it wasn't used as a market after > that. But maybe this was a different bit of land. The public markets may have been quite extensive in 1919. Market Avenue today is east of Main Street. The current city hall is on the site of the old market. There is a park south of city hall named "Old Market Square". (The previous, 2nd, 1888 city hall was on the other side of Main Street where the Manitoba Meseum na Centenial Concert Hall are today.) My memories of the old market are from childhood when I didn't have much geographic sense of where things: we got in the car, drove past buildings, familiar and unfamiliar, and got there. Also mostly eveinings in in October when the market and surrounding retailers were open late. Google Maps is a quick and easy way to "tour" the area, incicdentally. > I'm not reading history linearly, I'm doing searches and finding little > bits here and there, people's interpretations of what they read or > knew. > > > Yes, it's not uncommon. Here in Montreal, we had the Dow Planetarium, > a beer company that disappeared not long after. Some years back, the > city decided a new planetarium was needed, it was seen as easier to > build anew than revamp the old one. So the land was up for grabs, but > it had that rider on it. After some years, one of the universities > came up with some use for it, which seems acceptable to all. > > Michael
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Beware the microsoft cloud? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-13 17:28 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mentificium@gmail.com - 2016-05-14 09:22 -0700
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-05-21 12:31 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-21 13:16 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-22 13:15 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 09:58 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-23 11:49 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-23 11:56 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 15:02 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 20:57 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 16:19 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 04:02 +1000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-05-24 10:59 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 14:30 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-05-23 14:04 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 23:23 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 04:40 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:48 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 07:47 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 17:43 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 14:13 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:38 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 17:55 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 20:25 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 15:02 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 20:51 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-24 19:24 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:38 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 23:28 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:03 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:28 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:52 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:33 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:17 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 17:23 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 07:47 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-24 11:55 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:16 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-24 21:31 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 07:37 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 07:24 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-26 13:57 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 07:36 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-05-25 06:53 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-05-23 19:56 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:42 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:28 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 21:57 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-24 11:55 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-22 16:42 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-23 11:49 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 15:01 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-24 13:33 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:00 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btopenworld.com> - 2016-05-24 14:16 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:04 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-25 13:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:28 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 16:15 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:31 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:12 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-24 21:27 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 16:04 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 17:15 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:00 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-05-23 16:25 -0300
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:04 +1000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 06:40 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-23 16:16 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-05-23 19:58 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? pechter@t61.(none) (William Pechter) - 2016-05-29 20:35 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-05-23 12:53 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:08 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-25 13:11 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:22 +0200
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-25 17:51 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-06-01 13:16 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-01 20:59 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-02 12:09 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-06-02 16:39 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-02 20:44 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-03 13:16 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 15:04 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 13:44 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:22 +0100
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-06-04 19:02 -0700
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 05:14 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-05 17:38 +0000
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 14:39 -0400
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:08 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 12:44 -0500
Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 14:31 +0000
csiph-web