Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #163930

Re: Beware the microsoft cloud?

From Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: Beware the microsoft cloud?
Date 2016-05-24 15:02 -0400
Organization National Capital Freenet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Message-ID <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241458510.20979@darkstar.example.org> (permalink)
References (20 earlier) <dqh2hbF3h71U1@mid.individual.net> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605232317380.19694@darkstar.example.org> <XnsA611E74FBCD8Bfalkarcabca@213.239.209.88> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241232390.20600@darkstar.example.org> <XnsA61279EB69B87falkarcabca@213.239.209.88>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 24 May 2016, Alfred Falk wrote:

> Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in
> news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1605241232390.20600@darkstar.example.org:
>
>> On Tue, 24 May 2016, Alfred Falk wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in
>>> news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1605232317380.19694@darkstar.example.org:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2016, Osmium wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Michael Black" wrotee:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Years ago, a cousin of my mother who was interested in genealogy
>>>>>> did a family tree on my father's side, and that was it.  Then about
>>>>>> 2009 I started doing searches, and it's amazing how much is online.
>>>>>>  Not just the family tree, but all kinds of history of it.  I am
>>>>>> sort of torn, on one hand the family did have some role in
>>>>>> "history", but at the same time, they left a lot of paper around,
>>>>>> so it's easier for people to study them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I never thought of my grandmother as a social butterfly but I found
>>>>> an internet account of her hosting her card club in the 1930s.  I
>>>>> looked for it recently and it had "gone missing" as people sometimes
>>>>> say.
>>>>>
>>>> I've been saving some of the stuff locally, precisely because I don't
>>>> trust that it will remain in place.  Some cousin I'd never heard of
>>>> had the family tree up on his page, but that's disappeared, I fear
>>>> he's disappeared too.
>>>>
>>>> It is shakey.  My great, great grandmother Henrietta is in the
>>>> Canadian Museum of History, at least their webpage, just a small bit
>>>> representing half breeds.  Her picture is readily available
>>>> elsewhere, I have a book with her photo in it. (I assume it's the
>>>> only photo of her, it wasn't the time of snapshot cameras).  But
>>>> museums change their displays, so I can imagine her getting bumped at
>>>> some point.  There's no information at that site about her that isn't
>>>> elsewhere, but it's kind of neat that she's there (and I assume
>>>> because her photo and identity was already out there, not because
>>>> she's that important).
>>>>
>>>> I figured if I made the trip to the actual museum, I'd say "You mean
>>>> I don't get free entry?  But that's my great, great grandmother you
>>>> have on display!".
>>>>
>>>> Some of her siblings got streets named after them in what became
>>>> Winnipeg. But her younger sister Jemima (yes Aunt Jemima), who had
>>>> self esteem issues (actually all the siblings suffered a bit from
>>>> that), her street was renamed, so there's no longer a Jemima Street,
>>>> just an Elgin Street.
>>>
>>> Elgin _Avenue_. Not far from the location of my earliest childhood
>>> memories. And even closer to my first home, of which I have no
>>> memories.  A lot of the short streets near there have women's names:
>>> Lulu, Dorothy, Gwendoline, etc. I suppose the next avenue north is
>>> also named for your ancestors?
>>>
>> I haven't looked at a map, I just found some old historical society
>> article about where the street names came from.
>>
>> I assume the streets were named very early, rather than in retrospect.
>> So they are first names, just "plain people" who's father had the clout
>> to name the streets after them. James Street is for Henrietta's
>> brother, chief justice in the provisional government.  Not even a last
>> name.
>>
>> I assume other families had say in the street naming, so those you name
>> are likely named after the daughters of other gentry.
>>
>> On the other hand, there is John Black Avenue, after Henrietta's
>> husband. That's less generic than James Street. I guess that's why she
>> doesn't get a street named after her.  There's also  John Black United
>> Church, they had their 100th anniversary last year or
>> the year before.
>
>> And then I found that Winnipeg can't sell the old police HQ, because it
>> was land sold to the early city of Winnipeg for a good price by the
>> cousins, on the condition it be used for the public good (I forget the
>> exact words).  So if the city sells it, the money reverts to the
>> cousins.
>
> I think such caveats were fairly common.  When Winnipeg built its new city
> hall in the 1960's they used land that was given or sold to city for the
> explicit purpose of being a farmers' market.  That use was fading then, but
> there were legal battles.  There have been similar situations in Edmonton
> where I live now.
>
That maybe was family land.  I gather there are some other municipal 
buildings that were on that land.

But, some of the land was also used for a public market.  What I read was 
that it was used as a meeting place during the Great Winnipeg Strike, and 
the way the piece read, it wasn't used as a market after that.  But maybe 
this was a different bit of land.

I'm not reading history linearly, I'm doing searches and finding little 
bits here and there, people's interpretations of what they read or knew.


Yes, it's not uncommon.  Here in Montreal, we had the Dow Planetarium, a 
beer company that disappeared not long after.  Some years back, the city 
decided a new planetarium was needed, it was seen as easier to build anew 
than revamp the old one.  So the land was up for grabs, but it had that 
rider on it.  After some years, one of the universities came up with some 
use for it, which seems acceptable to all.

   Michael

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Beware the microsoft cloud? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-13 17:28 +0100
  Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mentificium@gmail.com - 2016-05-14 09:22 -0700
  Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-05-21 12:31 +0000
    Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-21 13:16 +0000
      Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-22 13:15 +0000
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 09:58 -0400
          Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-23 11:49 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-23 11:56 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 15:02 +0000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 20:57 +0100
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 16:19 +0100
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 04:02 +1000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-05-24 10:59 -0500
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 14:30 -0400
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-05-23 14:04 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 23:23 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 04:40 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:48 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 07:47 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 17:43 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 14:13 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:38 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 17:55 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 20:25 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 15:02 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Alfred Falk <falk@arc.ab.ca> - 2016-05-24 20:51 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-24 19:24 +0000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:38 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-23 23:28 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:03 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:28 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:52 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:33 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:17 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 17:23 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 07:47 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-24 11:55 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:16 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-24 21:31 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 07:37 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 07:24 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-26 13:57 +0100
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 07:36 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-05-25 06:53 +0100
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-05-23 19:56 -0500
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-24 12:42 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:28 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 21:57 -0400
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-24 11:55 -0400
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-22 16:42 +0000
          Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-23 11:49 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 15:01 +0000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-24 13:33 +0100
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:00 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btopenworld.com> - 2016-05-24 14:16 +0100
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:04 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-25 13:11 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:28 +0200
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-25 16:15 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:31 +0100
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-24 17:12 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-24 21:27 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 16:04 +0100
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-05-23 17:15 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:00 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-05-23 16:25 -0300
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:04 +1000
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 06:40 +0100
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-23 16:16 +0200
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-05-23 19:58 -0500
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? pechter@t61.(none) (William Pechter) - 2016-05-29 20:35 +0000
    Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-05-23 12:53 -0400
      Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-24 12:11 +0000
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-24 18:08 +0200
          Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-25 13:11 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:22 +0200
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-25 17:51 +0000
        Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-06-01 13:16 -0400
          Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-01 20:59 +0000
          Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-02 12:09 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-06-02 16:39 +0000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-02 20:44 +0000
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-03 13:16 +0000
            Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 15:04 +0100
              Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 13:44 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:22 +0100
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-06-04 19:02 -0700
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 05:14 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-05 17:38 +0000
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 14:39 -0400
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:08 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 12:44 -0500
                Re: Beware the microsoft cloud? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 14:31 +0000

csiph-web