Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27598
| Date | 2014-02-26 15:45 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> |
| Organization | Trollbusters 3 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java code |
| References | <ac8eddc9-1375-4387-9fe4-89a8a11ef11f@googlegroups.com> <1o6dnRRLlOIZI5TOnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com> <Ba9Pu.17001$yN4.14072@fx29.iad> <S6WdnaPBEp68nZPOnZ2dnUVZ8tudnZ2d@bt.com> <87mwhd7vvd.fsf@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <VL-dnfEeKLOrkZPOnZ2dnUVZ8o-dnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
On 26/02/14 15:10, Simon Lewis wrote:
> lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> writes:
>
>> On 25/02/14 22:54, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>> On 2/23/14 1:25 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>> On 21/02/14 00:03, jay'el antonio wrote:
>>>>> please someone help me..what is the code of this output program using
>>>>> java
>>>>> 11
>>>>> 221
>>>>> 3321
>>>>> 44321
>>>>> 554321
>>>>> 6654321
>>>>> 77654321
>>>>> 887654321
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> You are a Troll, sans Hunter. You also made that far more complicated
>>> than it needs to be.
>>>
>>> public class BetterThanATroll {
>>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>>> String s = "";
>>> for (int i = 1; i <= 8; ++i) {
>>> s = i + s;
>>> System.out.println(i + s);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> Well now let's analyze your 'solution' shall we.
>>
>> Agreed the 'specification' is a little lacking but as we are unable to go back
>> to the client at this time we need to make some assumptions.
>>
>> Assumption 1. It's 'homework'
>>
>> OK, now what do you imagine the learning objectives are?
>>
>> Well it certainly looks 'loopy' so
>>
>> Assumption 2. It's intended to get the student to learn about loop control
>> variables, possibly to control nested loops.
>>
>> The output is numeric so
>>
>> Assumption 3. It's intended to exercise some understanding of manipulation of
>> numeric variables ...
>>
>> Well that's about it for the assumptions, now how does your solution meet the
>> objectives?
>>
>> ... ah yes, String concatenation in a for loop
>>
>> 1/10 for effort
>
> Nicely done. Why is that Java groups and IRC channels in particular are
> so full of self inflated pompous idiots who seem to be there only to
> belittle others and demonstrate their inate stupidity and narrow
> mindedness?
A question I have often asked myself ... I've yet to find the definitive
answer.
I don't know how long you've been involved in software development but
this attitude of smug self satisfied pomposity pervades the software
industry like a nasty smell.
This group is particularly well endowed with smart arses. It's
interesting to note that certain individuals who post here and in other
groups only exhibit the worst of their arrogance in c.l.j.p. They would
be given short shrift if they tried any of their nonsense in other
groups. They are basically bullies and we know that the only way to deal
with a bully is to stand up to them as they are also mostly cowards.
Ho hum, it all adds to the rich tapestry of life I suppose
I gave up on IRC a long time ago, if you want to discuss Java stuff go
ahead, ignore the twats, there are helpful people here it's just that
they sometimes get drowned out by the noise.
--
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer,
treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java code "jay'el antonio" <jlantonio10@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-21 14:29 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 01:10 -0600
Re: java code Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-22 12:36 +0100
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 13:57 +0100
Re: java code Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-02-22 12:05 -0600
Re: java code Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2014-02-22 20:02 +0100
Re: java code Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-23 00:52 -0800
Re: java code Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-21 08:55 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-23 09:25 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 20:47 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-24 09:06 +0000
Re: java code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-02-24 19:23 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-25 09:22 +0000
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 15:08 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 08:47 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-25 03:56 -0600
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-25 14:54 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 09:07 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:40 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 14:54 +0000
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 16:10 +0100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-02-26 15:45 +0000
Re: java code Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +0100
Re: java code Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:48 +0100
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-02-27 09:49 -0600
Re: java code Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-02-27 19:24 +0100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:53 -0800
Re: java code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 16:10 -0800
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:36 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 20:51 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:31 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:44 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:49 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:58 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:00 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:36 +1100
Re: java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2014-02-26 12:59 -0800
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-02-28 20:42 -0500
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 08:58 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 21:00 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 10:45 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 22:04 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-01 12:13 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 11:05 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 08:57 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 22:02 +1100
Re: java code lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-02 11:57 +0000
Re: java code leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-03-02 06:57 -0600
Re: java code David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2014-03-02 15:21 -0500
Re: java code rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-02-26 22:06 +0000
Re: java code "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:01 +1100
Re: java code v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2014-03-01 19:52 +0000
csiph-web