Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #67899
| Subject | Re: About getters/setters |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| References | <kSg7F.32840$Xs5.970@fx06.am4> <86y2zk26ps.fsf@mailhub.linuxsc.com> |
| From | JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> |
| Message-ID | <SqL7F.98411$WI2.78457@fx34.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2019-08-23 07:09 +0100 |
On 22/08/2019 23:09, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> (Incidentally I am ignoring the "age/birthday" matter
> that some other people have commented on, and assuming your
> question is meant as generic, with 'age' being merely an
> unfortunate choice of example.)
correct. the example given might not have been the best. general
question about all situations.
>
> I suggest however a slightly different pattern than (1), along
> these lines (disclaimer: not compiled):
>
> class Person {
> unsigned siblings_;
> // ... other data members ...
>
> public:
> // ... other member functions
>
> unsigned &siblings() { return siblings_; }
> const unsigned &siblings() const { return siblings_; }
> };
>
> Now our accessor functions look more like data member access, but
> they remain functions:
>
> if( fred.siblings() > 0 ) ...
>
> fred.siblings() += 1; // a new birth in fred's family
>
> To me this pattern reads nicer on the client side than set/get
> functions.
yes many seems to suggest this online
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-21 20:22 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-21 19:34 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2019-08-21 21:40 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-21 12:52 -0700
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-22 15:25 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-22 09:06 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-24 04:32 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-22 15:09 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-23 05:26 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-23 18:07 +0000
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:09 +0100
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:13 +0100
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-23 09:30 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-25 06:16 +0000
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-25 12:12 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 11:24 +0000
Re: About getters/setters James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-23 08:34 -0400
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 14:48 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 15:49 +0000
csiph-web